| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2025 SLG 4702 2025 SLD 4702 = 2025 PLC 669 |
Punjab Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal
Service Appeal No.26 of 2013 and connected Service Appeal No.19 of 2010, decided on 17th January, 2025
Before Muhammad Sajid Mehmood Sethi, Chairman, Abid Husain Chattha and Rasaal Hasan Syed, Members
Ch. Zubair Ahmad Farooq and Ch. Muhammad Tariq-ur-Rehman for Appellant. Zawar Ahmad Sheikh and Zubda tul Hussain for
Respondent.
Service Appeal No.26 of 2013 and connected Service Appeal No.19 of 2010, decided on 17th January, 2025
Before Muhammad Sajid Mehmood Sethi, Chairman, Abid Husain Chattha and Rasaal Hasan Syed, Members
Ch. Zubair Ahmad Farooq and Ch. Muhammad Tariq-ur-Rehman for Appellant. Zawar Ahmad Sheikh and Zubda tul Hussain for
Respondent.
MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZAHID, ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSION JUDGE
VERSUS
LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE through Registrar
Law: Punjab Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal Act, 1991
Section: XII,5
Punjab Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal Act (XII of 1991)-------S. 5---Judicial officer---Service appeal---Allegation of corruption and ill-repute--Recording of adverse remarks---Penalty of removal from service---Long service---Mitigating circumstances---Quantum of punishment---Principle of proportionality--Conversion of penalty---P.W. 4 during his examination-in-chief stated that appellant did not receive even a penny and during his cross-examination he denied his signature on the complaint and disowned its contents---P.W.5 during his crossexamination stated that he had not personally paid any illegal gratification to the appellant and could not identify the official, who allegedly demanded the illegal gratification---Charge of receiving illegal gratification had not been proved against the appellant, however, allegations of corruption and ill-repute remained on record--Owing to mitigating circumstances and analyzing different factors the penalty of removal from service was converted into compulsory retirement---Courts have consistently emphasized the importance of considering the employee's length of service, the nature of the offence and the context surrounding the misconduct---A fair and just approach to disciplinary actions is essential in maintaining morale and ensuring that penalties are proportionate to the offences committed---Penalty of removal from service was not proportionate to the gravity of the misconduct proved against the appellant, thus, the same was converted into compulsory retirement--Appeal was partly allowed, in circumstances.Akhtar Ali v. Director-General, Pakistan Post Office and others 2009 SCMR 1197; Farhad Ali v. Director General, Pakistan Post Office and others 2011 SCMR 608; State of Orissa and others v. Ram Chandra Das AIR 1996 SC 2436 or 1996 (5) SCC 331; Sukhdeo v. The Commissioner Amravati Division 1996 SCC (L&S) 1141 or 1996 (5) SCC 103 and S. Ramachandra Raju v. State of Orissa AIR 1995 SC 111 or 1994 (3) SCC(SUPP) 156 rel.Date of hearing: 17th January, 2025.JUDGMENTMUHAMMAD SAJID MEHMOOD SETHI, CHAIRMAN.---Through instant appeal, notification dated 06.05.2013 and letter/ order dated 27.07.2013, passed by the…