| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1977 SLG 1641 1977 SLD 1641 1977 PLC 342 |
Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh
Appeal No. HYD-41 of 1975, decided on 25th July 1975.
GHULAM RASOOL SHAIKH, APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Appeal No. HYD-41 of 1975, decided on 25th July 1975.
GHULAM RASOOL SHAIKH, APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
EMPLOYEES UNION
VS
WAZIRALI INDUSTRIES, HYDERABAD
Law:
Section:
(a) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)- -- S. 34 read with S. 2(xiii) [as amended by Industrial Relations (Amendment) Ordinance (XIX of 1974;] and West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), S. O. 10-C---"Industrial dispute"-Bonus-Right of bonus being guaranteed by S. O. 10, C does not amount to industrial dispute--Rights of parties under Standing Orders Ordinance to be determined by Labour Court under S 34. (b) Industrial dispute- -- Settlement in violation of law-Cannot have binding force on workman nor deprive him of benefits (guaranteed by law). Malik Mohammad Saeed for Appellant. Samiullah Khan for Respondent. DECISION This is an appeal under section 37 of the I. R. O. against the award of the Labour Court dismissing the industrial dispute. 2. The parties had entered into a settlement on 14--1973 agreeing to the payment of bonus for the year 1973 at the rate of 65 days' wages proportionate to their service period on the assumption that the profit shall not be less than twenty-eight lacs, subject to the condition that if there was no profit the workers would not be entitled to any bonus as by that time the account was not settled. According to the contention of the workers the profit for the year 1973 was about seventy-six lacs and as such they were entitled to get the bonus as laid down by Standing Order 10-C of the Standing Orders Ordinance, 1968. The Management did not agree, and, therefore, the Union made an application to this Tribunal under section 50 of the I. R. O. for the interpretation of the Settlement. The reference was rejected on the ground that there was no ambiguity in the settlement itself and it was left to the workers to either raise any industrial dispute or approach the Labour Court under section 34 of the I. R. O. The Union adopted the formal course and raised the industrial dispute. It was taken to the Labour Court but it was dismissed on the preliminary objection…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492