Case Details

Citation(s)
2023 SLG 2073 2023 SLD 2073 = 2023 PLD 29
Peshawar High Court
Write Petition No. 1291-P of 2022, decided on 13th May, 2022.
Before Ijaz Anwar and Syed Arshad Ali, JJ
Tariq Kamal for Petitioners. Rab Nawaz Khan, A.A.G., along with Waqif Khan, Tehsildar Pabbi, District Nowshera. Muneer-ud-Din Ghori for
Respondents Nos.3 to 7. Date of hearing: 13th May, 2022

FAZAL KHAN and others---Petitioners

VERSUS

ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER and others---Respondents

Law: Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Land Revenue Act, (XVII of 1967)

Section: 175 , 135

Law: Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)

Section: 9 , 135

(a)   Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967)---

----S. 175---Prevention of encroachment upon common land---Scope---Respondents during pendency of their suit for perpetual and temporary injunction filed application before the Deputy Commissioner for possession of suit land purportedly under S. 175 of the Land Revenue Act, 1967---Application was marked by Deputy Commissioner to the Tehsildar concerned; who allegedly inspected the spot and handed over the disputed property to the respondents vide impugned order--Validity---Perusal of S. 175 revealed that the revenue officer could assume jurisdiction in the circumstances where a particular property was commonly reserved by a proprietary body of a village for the purpose of pasture, graveyard or other similar purpose and in case any person either belonging to the proprietary body or stranger had encroached upon the property, the revenue officer had the jurisdiction to intervene in the matter and recover the possession of the property from the encroacher by restoring it for the purpose for which it was reserved--Section 175 had no application in the matter when there was dispute between two co-owners in respect of the property which had not been reserved for any purpose--Revenue officials had not only acted without jurisdiction but their mala fide and collusion with the private respondents was evident from the record---Impugned order was set aside and the respondents were directed to restore possession of the property to the petitioners.

(b)   Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)---

🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register