Law:

Section:

(a) Workmen's Compensation Act (VIII of 1923)--- -- S. 30-Question whether evidence of one witness should be accepted in preference to other-Question of fact, not assailable in appeal. (b) Workmen's Compensation Act (VIII of 1923)--- ---Doctor certifying that workman suffered permanent partial disability to extent of 25 yd-Contention that fact of workman's being still in service and drawing same salary was sufficient to rebut evidence of Doctor-Held, without force. Divisional Superintendent v. Anwar Ali Appeal No. 25 of 1970 ref. Unman Ghani Rashid, A. A.-G. for Appellant. S. A. Channa for Respondent. DECISION This is an appeal under section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act against the order of the Commissioner awarding compensation to the respon­dent. 2. The respondent was in the employment of the Pakistan Railways. He sustained injuries. He received treatment in the Railways Hospital for 21 months. Subsequently he obtained a certificate from Dr. Aftab Ahmed Qureshi to the effect that he had suffered permanent partial disability t the extent of 25%. On the basis of this certificate he filed the claim. The appellant res1sted claim and pleaded that the respondent did not suffer…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492