Case Details

Citation(s)
1977 SLG 1624 1977 SLD 1624 1977 PLC 307
Labour Appellate Tribunal, Punjab
Petition No. 103 of 1974, decided on 26th June 1975.
MUHAMMAD MIAN QURESHI, PRESIDING OFFICER

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

EMPLOYEE UNION

VS

MULTAN ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY, MULTAN

Law:

Section:

(a) Industrial dispute­-- -----Re-employment of dismissed employee-Admin1strative discretion of Management-Demand of Workers' Union against such re-employ­ment rejected - Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), S. 32(1-A). (b) Industrial dispute--- ---Workers Union demanding constitution of Inspection Team to eradicate corruption-Matter purely of discretion of Management. In presence of Work Council envisaged under S. 24 of Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, demand of Union, held, not sustainable Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), S. 24. Syed Mohabbat Shah for Petitioner. Abdul Rashid for Respondent. ORDER This an application under section 35 read with section 32 (I-A) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 hereinafter mentioned the Ordinance filed by the Multan Electric Employees Union trough its General Secretary hereinafter mentioned as the petitioner Union against the Managing Director Multan, Electric Supply Company Multan hereinafter mentioned as the respondent Management. It is maintained in the petition that a demand notice dated 25th May 1974, followed by a strike notice dated 5th June 1974, being served on the respondent Management bilateral negotiation continued upto 11th November 1974, but no settlement could be achieved. The parties were advised to move the Labour Court for the disposal of the dispute. The demand notice contained the following demands: (1) Mr. Muhammad Maqbool Siddique Head Cashier was dismissed from service and the order of his dismissal was confirmed by the Labour Appellate Tribunal Lahore, he has been re-employed by the respondent Management illegally and he is damaging tide interest of the MESCO by his subversive activities. He should therefore be directed to be dismissed from service. (2) The respondent Management is covering up the misdeeds of Gulsher and Ghulam Rasul employees despite written complaints being filed against them by the petitioner-Union. Their cases should be enquired into and they should be punished without any delay. (3) Ever since the Company i. e. MESCO has been nationalised it has become an area of a few corrupt and selfish officers the pilfering of Electric energy has gone to…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492