Law:

Section:

(a) Question of fact- ----Contention that appellant having not been served ex parte proceeding could not be taken-Plea. held, involved a question of fact and could not be entertained in appeal. (b) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)- ---S. 25-A-Industrial dispute-Monetary benefits-Not permissible for period proceeding three months of service of grievance notice. Zarnirul Hassan for Appellant. Ashraf Hussain Rizvi for Respondent. Date of hearing: 15th October 1976. DECISION This is in appeal against the ex parte order of the Labour Court ordering re-instatement with certain benefits. 2. The respondent was in the service of the appellants having been appointed on 12th March, 1974. He was removed from service and monetary benefits admissible to him were denied. Consequently, he served grievance notice dated 4-5-1976 under se;;tion 25-A upon the Management. Since the relief was not granted he approached the Labour Court. 3. The respondent in spite of the service of the notice of the application remained absent and, therefore, an ex parte order was passed allowing re-instatement with following benefits as were claimed in the application:- (i) Profit bonus for two years. (ii) Encashment of earned leave for two years. (iii) C. L. A. and D. A. Rs. 110 per month from April 1975 to March 1976. (iv) C. L. A. at Rs. 85 per month w.e.f. June 1974 to March 1975. (v) C. L. A. Rs. 35 per month for April 1975. (vi) C. L. A. Rs. 35 per month for 20 days of March 1974.…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492