Law:

Section:

(a) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)- -- S. 25-A read with S. 2(xxviil)-Workman-Supervisor drawing more than Rs. 800 p. m.---Not a workman-Fact of his being incharge of one or entire establishment of concern -Would not take him out of category of Supervisors-Employment in supervisory capacity-Basic point for consideration. (b) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)- -- S. 25-A - Probationary employee;- Person employed on pro­bation for period of three months and his services terminated before expiry of probationary period-Held, no exception could be taken to removal from service. Mustafa Kamal Mirza for Appellant. Abdul Hadi Farid for Respondent. Date of hearing: 7th October 1976. DECISION This is an appeal against the order of the Labour Court dismissing the application made under section 25-A, I. R. O. against the removal from service. 2. The applicant was a supervisor working as Maintenance Supervisor, robber-Fitter on a salary of Rs. 1,400 per month. He was appointed on 22nd July, 1974 temporarily on probation for three months. He was, however discharged from service on 2nd October, 1974, before the expiry of the period of probation. 3. Aggrieved by the removal from service the appellant served a grievance notice and approached Labour Court by way of application under section 25-A, I. R. O. The application was resisted and it was pleaded that the appellant was not a workman within the meaning of I. R. O. and his services were…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492