Case Details

Citation(s)
2025 SLG 4585 2025 SLD 4585 = 2025 SCP 398
Supreme Court of Pakistan
CIVIL PETITION NO.1356 OF 2025 (On appeal against the judgment dated 24.02.2025 passed by the Peshawar High Court, Abbottabad Bench in FAO No.01-A/2025)
Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar Mr. Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb

Director General (Hqs) Civil Works Organization (CWO), Rawalpindi thr. its representative ....Petitioner

VERSUS

Syed Wali Shah and others … Respondents

Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973

Section: 185(3)

Law: Land Acquisition Act, 1894

Section: 18, 30, 31

Law: Code Of Civil Procedure, 1908.

Section: XXI,XXVII ,47

Summary

The Supreme Court dismissed the civil petition seeking leave to appeal against the Peshawar High Court's decision affirming the rejection of the government's objections in execution related to land acquisition compensation. The Court held that under Order XXI rule 23-A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), the judgment-debtor must deposit the decretal amount or furnish security to raise objections in execution. The petitioner, a government entity, failed to do so, and hence the objections were rightly deemed inadmissible despite claims of exemption under Order XXVII rule 8-A CPC. The concurrent findings of ownership and entitlement by the Executing Court and High Court were upheld, with no illegality found to warrant interference.

Core Points

  • The case involves acquisition of land for defense purposes and compensation disputes.
  • References enhanced compensation, upheld on appeal.
  • Execution objections by the government were dismissed for failure to deposit decretal amount or provide security.
  • Order XXI rule 23-A CPC mandates depositing decretal amount or furnishing security before filing execution objections.
  • Order XXVII rule 8-A CPC, exempting government from deposit/security in certain appellate proceedings, does not apply to execution objections.
  • Supreme Court upheld the trial and appellate courts' decisions rejecting objections.
  • Authorities emphasize strict compliance with deposit/security requirements to prevent frivolous objections.
  • No illegality or jurisdictional error found in the impugned judgment.
  • Petition for leave to appeal was dismissed.

Law and Section

Law/StatuteRelevant Section/RuleKey Point
Constitution of PakistanArticle 185(3)Leave to appeal to Supreme Court under this article
Land Acquisition Act, 1894Section 18, 30, 31Compensation and reference process for land acquisition
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)Order XXI Rule 23-ADeposit of decretal amount or furnishing security for execution objections mandatory
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)Order XXVII Rule 8-AExemption for government/public officers from furnishing security in appellate stays, not applicable in execution objections
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)Section 47Execution jurisdiction of the Executing Court

 

JUDGMENT

🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register