| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2025 SLG 4585 2025 SLD 4585 = 2025 SCP 398 |
CIVIL PETITION NO.1356 OF 2025 (On appeal against the judgment dated 24.02.2025 passed by the Peshawar High Court, Abbottabad Bench in FAO No.01-A/2025)
Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar Mr. Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb
Director General (Hqs) Civil Works Organization (CWO), Rawalpindi thr. its representative ....Petitioner
VERSUS
Syed Wali Shah and others … Respondents
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 185(3)
Law: Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Section: 18, 30, 31
Law: Code Of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Section: XXI,XXVII ,47
Summary
The Supreme Court dismissed the civil petition seeking leave to appeal against the Peshawar High Court's decision affirming the rejection of the government's objections in execution related to land acquisition compensation. The Court held that under Order XXI rule 23-A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), the judgment-debtor must deposit the decretal amount or furnish security to raise objections in execution. The petitioner, a government entity, failed to do so, and hence the objections were rightly deemed inadmissible despite claims of exemption under Order XXVII rule 8-A CPC. The concurrent findings of ownership and entitlement by the Executing Court and High Court were upheld, with no illegality found to warrant interference.
Core Points
- The case involves acquisition of land for defense purposes and compensation disputes.
- References enhanced compensation, upheld on appeal.
- Execution objections by the government were dismissed for failure to deposit decretal amount or provide security.
- Order XXI rule 23-A CPC mandates depositing decretal amount or furnishing security before filing execution objections.
- Order XXVII rule 8-A CPC, exempting government from deposit/security in certain appellate proceedings, does not apply to execution objections.
- Supreme Court upheld the trial and appellate courts' decisions rejecting objections.
- Authorities emphasize strict compliance with deposit/security requirements to prevent frivolous objections.
- No illegality or jurisdictional error found in the impugned judgment.
- Petition for leave to appeal was dismissed.
Law and Section
| Law/Statute | Relevant Section/Rule | Key Point |
|---|---|---|
| Constitution of Pakistan | Article 185(3) | Leave to appeal to Supreme Court under this article |
| Land Acquisition Act, 1894 | Section 18, 30, 31 | Compensation and reference process for land acquisition |
| Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) | Order XXI Rule 23-A | Deposit of decretal amount or furnishing security for execution objections mandatory |
| Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) | Order XXVII Rule 8-A | Exemption for government/public officers from furnishing security in appellate stays, not applicable in execution objections |
| Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) | Section 47 | Execution jurisdiction of the Executing Court |
JUDGMENT