| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2025 SLG 4363 2025 SLD 4363 = 2025 PLC 583 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition No. 1124-K of 2023, decided on 20th December, 2024. (Against judgment dated 27.07.2023 passed by the Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad (Karachi Bench) in Appeal No. 134 (K) CS of 2021).
Present: Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, JJ
Khalique Ahmed, Deputy Attorney General for Petitioners.
Respondent in person. Date of hearing: 20th December, 2024.
Civil Petition No. 1124-K of 2023, decided on 20th December, 2024. (Against judgment dated 27.07.2023 passed by the Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad (Karachi Bench) in Appeal No. 134 (K) CS of 2021).
Present: Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, JJ
Khalique Ahmed, Deputy Attorney General for Petitioners.
Respondent in person. Date of hearing: 20th December, 2024.
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Finance Division and another
VERSUS
ABDUL RASHEED MEMON
Law: Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973).
Section: 4
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 189
(a) Words and phrases---
----Per incuriam---Connotation---Verdict of a Court is considered per incuriam when it is rendered in ignorance of a statute or rule having force of statute.
Rupert Cross & J.W. Harris, Precedent in English Law, 149 (4th ed., 1991); Black's Law Dictionary (9th Edition)]; C.C.K. Allen in Law in the Making (Page 246); Huddersfield Police Authority v. Watson (1947) 2 All E.R.193; Morelle Ltd. v Wakeling (1955) 2 QB 379 and Young v. Bristol Aeroplane Co. Ltd. 1944 KB 718 at 729 = (1944) 2 All E.R. 293 at 300 rel.