| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2025 SLG 4291 2025 SLD 4291 = 2025 PLC 583 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition No. 1124-K of 2023, decided on 20th December, 2024. (Against judgment dated 27.07.2023 passed by the Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad (Karachi Bench) in Appeal No. 134 (K) CS of 2021).
Present: Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, JJ
Justice Khurshid Anwar Bhinder v. Federation of Pakistan PLD 2010 SC 483 rel. Khalique Ahmed, Deputy Attorney General for Petitioners.
Respondent in person. Date of hearing: 20th December, 2024.
Civil Petition No. 1124-K of 2023, decided on 20th December, 2024. (Against judgment dated 27.07.2023 passed by the Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad (Karachi Bench) in Appeal No. 134 (K) CS of 2021).
Present: Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, JJ
Justice Khurshid Anwar Bhinder v. Federation of Pakistan PLD 2010 SC 483 rel. Khalique Ahmed, Deputy Attorney General for Petitioners.
Respondent in person. Date of hearing: 20th December, 2024.
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Finance Division and another
VERSUS
ABDUL RASHEED MEMON
Law: Service Tribunals Act, 1973
Section: 4
(a) Words and phrases---
----Per incuriam---Connotation---Verdict of a Court is considered per incuriam when it is rendered in ignorance of a statute or rule having force of statute.
Rupert Cross & J.W. Harris, Precedent in English Law, 149 (4th ed., 1991); Black's Law Dictionary (9th Edition)]; C.C.K. Allen in Law in the Making (Page 246); Huddersfield Police Authority v. Watson (1947) 2 All E.R.193; Morelle Ltd. v Wakeling (1955) 2 QB 379 and Young v. Bristol Aeroplane Co. Ltd. 1944 KB 718 at 729 = (1944) 2 All E.R. 293 at 300 rel.