| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2025 SLG 4044 2025 SLD 4044 = 2025 PLC 262 |
Writ Petition No.585 of 2015, heard on 11th September, 2024.
Before Jawad Hassan, J
Zaheer Ahmad Qadri and Arshad Mehmood for Petitioner. Arshad Mehmood Malik, Assistant Attorney General. Muhammad Yasir Akbar Butt for
Respondents Nos.4 and 5. Date of hearing: 11th September, 2024
Malik AMANAT RASUL
VERSUS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 199
(a) Pakistan Ordnance Factories Allotment of Residential Plots to Officers Rules, 2002---
----Rr. 1(3), 5(1) & 5(2)(i)---Eligibility conditions for allotment of plots--Determination---Petitioner after his selection in Ministry of Population Welfare as Director claimed allotment of plot on the basis of his length of service rendered in POF Board Wah Cantt. after inclusion of period of probation and retaining the right of lien---Validity---Term "lien" has a statutory connotation and refers to a legal right of civil servants to hold a particular post, typically a higher one, to which they have been promoted or transferred, while still retaining a right on their original post, based on provisions provided for the same under the rules or regulations framed by the appropriate Government, thus, simply put, lien in service law is a right of a civil servant to return to his original position, based on the fulfilment of the conditions set out in the rules or regulations framed by the appropriate Government---Rules were promulgated on 31.05.2002 and R.1(3) of the Rules clearly speaks that the Rules shall come into force at once, thus, the same do not either expressly or impliedly, provide for any retrospective application and cannot operate to reverse or undo an action which took effect from the prior date of existence of the Rules---Petitioner claimed financial benefits of his previous service with POF and also claimed a residential plot on the basis thereof, however, his previous service rendered with the POF was allowed to be counted merely for pension purposes, but that was not solid ground for entitlement of plot under R.5 of the Rules as he was not the employee of the POF at the time of promulgation of the Rules---Constitutional petition was dismissed, in circumstances.
(b) Constitution of Pakistan---