Case Details

Citation(s)
2025 SLG 3999 2025 SLD 3999 = 2025 MLD 1357
Peshawar High Court
Civil Revision No. 1057-P of 2024 (and other connected cases) decided on 27th January, 2025.
Before Shakeel Ahmad, J
Furqan Ahmad for Petitioner.

PAKHTUNKHWA HIGHWAY AUTHORITY through Managing Director Peshawar---Petitioner

VERSUS

ARSHAD SHER ALI---Respondent

Law: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)

Section: O.XXXVII Rr.1, 2 , 115

Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)---

----O.XXXVII Rr.1, 2 & S. 115---Recovery suit on the basis of cheque---Ex parte proceedings in summary suit---Production of evidence in proof of claim, requirement of---Scope---Principle of natural justice and procedured fairness--Contention of the petitioner/plaintiff was that since an ex parte order had been passed against the defendants/respondents, thus, instead of passing an order for production of evidence of the plaintiff, Trial Courts hould have decreed the suit--Validity---In summary suits under O. XXXVII, C.P.C., where defendants are proceeded against ex parte, the plaintiff is still required to lead evidence to prove his claim---Ex parte decree in a summary suit under O. XXXVII, C.P.C. is not automatic---Plaintiff must provide sufficient evidence to allow the court to scrutinize the genuineness of the claim for ensuring that the judgment is based on solid proof---Necessity of recording plaintiff's evidence, even in ex parte summary suit proceedings, stems from principles of natural justice and fairness in procedure--Civil revision was dismissed in limine in circumstance.

 

🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register