| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2025 SLG 3827 2025 SLD 3827 = 2025 SCP 305 = 2026 SCMR 697 = 2026 PLC 993 |
CPLA.No.147-K/2023 (On appeal against the Order dated 23.01.2023 passed by the High Court of Sindh, Karachi in C.P.No.D-2901 of 2022)
Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Mr. Mohsin Shahwani, Additional Attorney General Mr. Ghulam Rasool Mangi, AOR Mr. Sajjad Mustafa, S.O, Ministry of Law.
Qazi Khalid Ali …Petitioner
VERSUS
Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary Ministry of Law and Justice Government of Pakistan and others. .....Respondent
Law: Federal Service Tribunals Act, (LXX of 1973)
Section: 3(4)
Law: Federal Service Tribunal Chairman and Members Service Rules, 1983
Section: 5
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 205, 212,260
Tagline : (1) Rule 5 of the FST (Chairman & Members) Service Rules, 1983 (2) Article 205 of the Constitution read with Clause 3 of the Fifth Schedule (3) Purpose of pension is to ensure old-age security in the second inning (4) Pension is a right and not charity/alms/donation but compensation for services.
Summary:
This judgment concerns a civil petition where the petitioner, after serving as Chairman of the Federal Service Tribunal (FST), sought pensionary benefits which were denied by the Ministry of Law & Justice. The court found that the Ministry failed to consider Rule 5 of the Federal Service Tribunal (Chairman and Members) Service Rules, 1983, which entitles the Chairman to pensionary benefits akin to a High Court judge if he is not a judge or government servant. The case is remanded for reconsideration in light of the said Rule, with a clear directive to issue a speaking order within three months.
Core Points:
- The petitioner served as Chairman, FST, and sought pension under the Presidential Order No. 3 of 1997.
- His appointment and service period were disputed as the High Court judgeship was declared void ab initio.
- Rule 5 of the Federal Service Tribunal (Chairman and Members) Service Rules, 1983, entitles non-judge Chairmen to salary, allowances, and privileges of a High Court judge.
- Ministry of Law & Justice denied pension citing the void status of the petitioner’s judgeship and contractual appointment.
- The High Court failed to properly consider Rule 5 in its impugned judgment.
- Supreme Court directed remand to Ministry for fresh consideration of pension claim under the Rules within three months.
- Ministry instructed to pass speaking order without influence from prior adverse findings and with an independent application of mind.
- Emphasis on pension as a vested right and economic refuge after service.
Law and Section Table:
| Law/Rule Name | Section/Rule | Citation |
|---|---|---|
| Federal Service Tribunal Act, 1973 | Section 3(4) | - |
| Federal Service Tribunal (Chairman and Members) Service Rules, 1983 | Rule 5 | - |
| High Court Judges (Leave, Pension & Privileges) Order | - | Presidential Order No. 3 of 1997 |
| Constitution of Pakistan, 1973 | Article 205 | - |
| Constitution of Pakistan, 1973 | Article 212 | - |
| Constitution of Pakistan, 1973 | Article 260 | - |