| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2025 SLG 3806 2025 SLD 3806 = 2025 CLC 248 |
Sindh High Court
Execution No. 20 of 2020, decided on 16th February, 2023.
Before Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam, J
Decree Holder by its Chairman Muhammad Mehmood Ali Mehkri. Dr. Irfan Ahmed Chattha and Nayer Ziauddin for Judgment Debtor No. 1. Nemo for Judgment Debtor No. 2.
Execution No. 20 of 2020, decided on 16th February, 2023.
Before Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam, J
Decree Holder by its Chairman Muhammad Mehmood Ali Mehkri. Dr. Irfan Ahmed Chattha and Nayer Ziauddin for Judgment Debtor No. 1. Nemo for Judgment Debtor No. 2.
METROPOLITAN STEEL CORPORATION LIMITED ---Petitioner
VERSUS
MULTAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY and another ---Respondents
Law: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)
Section: 37,38,39,47,VII,11
(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)-------Ss.37, 38, 39 & 47---Execution application---Precept---Scope---Decree attaining finality---Effect---Judgment-debtor (a power distribution company) filed application to transfer the execution proceedings to the city/court where their head office was situated---Validity---No appeal had been preferred, not even till date, against the judgment and decree against the applicant (judgment-debtor); thus, the same (decree) hadd attained finality---Substantial justice is to be done between the litigants---Once a decree attains finality, then, statutory right and interest accrue in favour of decree-holder, which cannot be strangulated on the basis of procedural law, status of which is that of stepping stone and not a stumbling block---Therefore, application filed by judgment debtor, was not tenable; consequently, the same was dismissed---Decretal amount, already attached was ordered to be paid to the decree holder forthwith---Execution application, filed by decree-holder, was granted.Dino Manekji Chinoy and 8 others v. Muhammad Matin PLD 1983 SC 69 ref.(b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)-------Ss.37, 38, 39 & 47---Execution proceedings---Precept---Decretal amount, depositing of---Effect---Judgment-debtor (a power distribution company) filed application to transfer of execution proceedings to the city/court where their head office was situated---Validity---Record (including Nazir's Report) revealed that decretal amount had been attached---Since the order attaching the said amount had also attained finality, therefore, there should be no impediment in allowing the present execution application---Therefore, application filed by judgment debtor, was not tenable; consequently, the same was dismissed---Decretal amount, already attached, was ordered to be paid to the decree holder forthwith---Execution application, filed by decree-holder, was granted.(c) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)-------Ss. 37, 38, 39 & 47 & O.VII. R. 11---Jurisdiction of Court already determined--Scope---Judgment-debtor (a power distribution company) filed application to…