Case Details

Citation(s)
2025 SLG 3781 2025 SLD 3781 = 2025 CLD 872
Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan
Appeal No.53 of 2022, decided on 1st January, 2025.
Before Akif Saeed, Chairman/Commissioner and Abdul Rehman Warraich, Commissioner
Ali Ibrahim for Appellant. Shafiq-ur-Rehman, Additional Joint Director, Adjudication-I, SECP for
Respondent.

The UNITED INSURANCE COMPANY OF PAKISTAN LIMITED--Appellant

VERSUS

The HOD, ADJUDICATION-I, ADJUDICATION DIVISION, SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD--Respondent

Law: Insurance Ordinance, 2000

Section: XXXIX,156,166

Law: General Clauses Act, 1897

Section: X,24A

(a) Insurance Ordinance (XXXIX of 2000)-------Ss. 156 & 166---SRO No. 1545(I)/2019 dated December 6, 2019---Insurance of public property, matter of---Violations---Penalty, imposition of---Powers---Subdelegation---HOD-Adjudication---Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan ('Commission') penalized Appellant (Insurance Company) on a complaint lodged by National Insurance Company Limited (NICL/Complainant) for underwriting insurance policies of vehicles of a public sector entity (PASSCO)--Appellant raised objections regarding SRO No. 1545(I)/2019 dated December 6,2019 ('the SRO') including that the delegation of powers under S. 156 of theInsurance Ordinance, 2000 ('the Ordinance, 2000') to Commissioner Insurance, HOD-Adjudication-I and Wing Head Adjudication-1 tantamount to sub-delegation of the Commission's powers---Validity---Filing of a complaint to seek clarification regarding the SRO had no bearing on the merits of the case and it appeared that while relying on such ground, the Appellant was trying to evade the due process of law---Through the SRO, powers under the different administered legislations of the Commission had been delegated to the Commissioners, Heads of Department and Wing Heads---Section 156 of the Ordinance, 2000 was a penal clause that was delegated to different persons to adjudicate the matters involving violations of the substantive provisions of the Insurance Ordinance, 2000---Sub-delegation was the process whereby a delegate further delegated powers delegated to him, to any third person, but in the present case, the Commission had directly delegated its powers to different persons including the Respondent---Preamble of the SRO was selfexplanatory that the Commission had delegated its powers through the SRO to different officers, so the question of sub-delegation did not arise---Thus, the Appellant's objections were mis-conceived---Appeal, filed by Insurance Company, being merit-less was dismissed, in circumstances.(b) General Clauses Act (X of 1897)-------S. 24-A---Insurance Ordinance (XXXIX of 2000), Ss. 156 & 166---Insurance of public property, matter of---Violations---Penalty, imposition of---Non-speaking order, plea…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register