Case Details

Citation(s)
2025 SLG 3433 2025 SLD 3433 = 2025 MLD 630
Gilgit Baltistan Chief Court
Civil Misc. No. 644 of 2024, decided on 31st October, 2024.
Before Ali Baig, C.J
Muhammad Bashir for Petitioners. Basharat Ali for Contesting
Respondents (Set-I). Hujjat Ullah for
Respondents Nos. 5 and 6.
Respondents Nos. 7 to 39 have already been proceeded ex-parte vide order sheet dated 17.10.2024.
Respondents Nos. 1 to 4 absent. Date of hearing: 31st October, 2024.

TAJ MUHAMMAD and 19 others---Petitioners

VERSUS

PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary Gilgit-Baltistan Gilgit and 38 others---Respondents

Law: Code Of Civil Procedure, 1908.

Section: 24

(a)    Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)---

----S. 24---Transfer application---Bias in judge, allegation of---Plea of the petitioners was that they had lost confidence in the judge (Diamer) as he had close relations with the contesting party---Validity---Petitioners had not been able to establish that the judge had any close relations with the respondents (contesting party) as the judge belonged to Gilgit and was a Pathan by caste, who had nothing to do with the opposing party (respondents)---Petitioners had failed to mention any reasonable ground for transfer of case from the present Trial Court (Diamer) to any other Court of competent jurisdiction---Petition for transfer, being merit-less, was dismissed, in circumstances.

(b)   Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)---

🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register