| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1977 SLG 1391 1977 SLD 1391 (1977) 110 ITR 639 |
Kerala High Court
IT References Nos. 121 to 124 of 1971 June 29, 1973
P. GOVINDAN NAIR, ACTG. C.J., AND GEORGE VADAKKEL, J.
T.L. Viswanatha Iyer and E.R. Venkiteswaran for the Appellant
IT References Nos. 121 to 124 of 1971 June 29, 1973
P. GOVINDAN NAIR, ACTG. C.J., AND GEORGE VADAKKEL, J.
T.L. Viswanatha Iyer and E.R. Venkiteswaran for the Appellant
Thirumbadi Rubber Co. Ltd.
v.
Commissioner of Agricultural IncomE tax
Law:
Section:
- Section 2(a) - Kerala Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1950 JUDGMENT George Vadakkel, J.-These four references are at the instance of the assessee and are in respect of four assessment years 1961-62 to 1964-65 (both inclusive). The questions are : "(1.) Whether the sale proceeds of rubber trees sold for being cut and removed with roots for re-plantation for a single consideration can be separated into the value of the trees and the value of the latex that can possibly be extracted therefrom by slaughter-tapping and whether the latter is assessable as agricultural income in the hands of the owner who sold the trees ? (2.) Whether the income attributed to the centrifugal process, etc., is assessable as agricultural income ? (3) Whether in the absence of a machinery to harmonise and reconcile the assessment and fixation of the quantum of assessable income and apportioned expenditure under the State and Central enactments, the agricultural income-tax department is justified in not following or ignoring the basis and assessment of the Central income-tax authorities and disallow legitimate expenditure apportioned to it by adopting different methods, inconsistent with and rejected by the Central income-tax authorities in view of article 366 of the Constitution and whether the proper basis of apportionment is the one adopted by the Central income-tax authorities or the agricultural income-tax authorities ?" 2. Mr. T.L. Viswanatha Iyer, learned counsel for the assessee, at whose instance the references were made, at the outset submitted that questions Nos. 2 and 3 have become purely academic, in that it has been held by the income-tax authorities that the income attributable to centrifugal process, etc., is not assessable to tax under the Indian Income-tax Act. Regarding the income attributable to centrifugal process the assessee contended that a portion of such income has been held to be business income assessable under the Indian Income-tax Act, and that, therefore, that much income should be exempted in computing agricultural income. The Tribunal overruled this claim for the reason that the Income-tax Act or Rules do not warrant the assumption that such income is…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492