| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2025 SLG 3417 2025 SLD 3417 = 2025 PLD 84 |
Writ Petition No. 1521-P of 2021, decided on 14th May, 2024.
Before S M Attique Shah and Syed Arshad Ali, JJ
Adeel Anwar Jehangir for Petitioners. Muhammad Bashar Naveed, A.A.G. and Rahat Ali Khan Nahaqi, Assistant Attorney General along with Abbas Khan, D.G. Drugs and Ibrahim, Deputy Secretary Drugs for
Respondents. Date of hearing: 14th May, 2024.
MUHAMMAD ANWAR and others---Petitioners
VERSUS
GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA, PESHAWAR through Chief Secretary and others ---Respondents
Law: Pharmacy Act, 1967
Section: 25
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 18,199
Pharmacy Act (XI of 1967)---
----S.25---Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Drugs Rules, 1982, R. 18---Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 18 & 199---Constitutional petition---License of Pharmacist, renewal of ---Category-B Pharmacists/Dispensers and Category-C Apprentices---Policy matter---Petitioners were aggrieved of refusal of authorities to renew their licenses on the ground that they were only Category-B Pharmacists/Dispensers and CategoryC Apprentices, due to amendment made to Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Drug Rules, 1982--Validity---Amendment was brought in Khyber Pakhtun-khwa Drug Rules, 1982, in public interest as sale by non-qualified persons would endanger lives of public--Decision of Provincial Government to amend the rules was a policy matter of the Province and had been in the larger interest of people---Reasonable qualification was prescribed by law for entering into a lawful trade/business---In the year 1980, when rules were first passed, there was dearth of qualified pharmacists hence laxity in qualifications for drug retail license---Situation was substantially different and pharmacy graduates were neither hard nor costly to find---Prohibiting carrying of such business by unqualified person was in public interest and qualification so prescribed by government through legislation in question qualified the test of reasonableness---High Court declined to interfere in policy decision of Government---Constitutional petition was dismissed, in circumstances.
Judicial Review of Public Actions by Justice (R) Fazal Karim page-728; Government of Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of Commerce and another v. Zamir Ahmad Khan PLD 1975 SC 667; 83 US 36; 21 L Ed 394; Ganapati v. The State of Ajmir AIR 1955 SC 188; Cooverji v. Excise Commissioner AIR 1954 SC 220 and Arshad Mehmood and others v. Government of Punjab through Secretary, Transport Civil Secretariat, Lahore and others PLD 2005 SC 193 ref.