| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2025 SLG 3353 2025 SLD 3353 |
Civil Revision No. 1057-P of 2024.
SHAKEEL AHMAD, J.
27.01.2025 Present: - Mr. Furqan Ahmad, advocate for the petitioner.
Pakhtunkhwa Highway Authority through its Managing Director, Peshawar
VS
Arshad Sher Ali and 1 another
Law: Code Of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Section: XXXVII
REMARKS
Even, if the defendant are placed ex-parte, the Court can still demand sufficient evidence from the plaintiff to prove the claim. This is important for ensuring the judgment is based on solid proof.
Summary:
The petitioner filed a civil revision against an order directing him to deposit diet money for official witnesses and present his private witnesses in a summary suit under Order XXXVII CPC for recovery of Rs. 2,304,000. He argued that the trial court should have decreed the suit ex-parte without requiring evidence. The court held that even in ex-parte summary suits, the plaintiff must present sufficient evidence to prove the claim, especially for large amounts, to ensure fairness and natural justice. Petition dismissed in limine.