Case Details

Citation(s)
2025 SLG 3323 2025 SLD 3323
Peshawar High Court
Writ Petition (Q) No. 31‐A/2024
SADIQ ALI, J.
Date of hearing: 12.02.2025 Petitioners (Sardar Faraz Hussain & 02 others) By Mr. Waheed Jan Muhammad, Advocate.
Respondent (State) By Mr. Shoaib Ali, Assistant Advocate and (Syed Faisal Shah) By Malik Asif Ali, Advocate.

Sardar Faraz Hussain

VS

The State

Law: Pakistan Penal Code (PPC),1860

Section: 419, 420, 468, 471, 408, 409

Law: Companies Act, 2017

Section: 476, 477, 497

Law: Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan Act, (XLII of 1997)

Section: 38, 561

Law: Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1898

Section: 199

Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973

Section:

REMARKS

(a)The Companies Act, 2017 was enacted to provide a special and expedited mechanism for resolving corporate disputes and related matters. It is a well-established principle that when both a special law and a general law apply to a situation, the provisions of the special law prevail over the general law.
(b)Section 477 of the Companies Act, 2017 sets out that offences listed in the Eighth Schedule can only be prosecuted upon a written complaint by the SECP (Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan), the registrar, or qualified members or creditors holding at least 5% of the issued share capital (or equivalent interest in case of creditors). For companies without share capital, any member or creditor eligible to file a winding-up petition can also file a complaint. This provision ensures that only authorized parties can initiate legal proceedings for specified corporate offences, preventing frivolous cases. Section 497 imposes penalties on directors, officers, or employees who wrongfully possess, withhold, or misuse company property. Such persons may face a fine up to one million rupees and may be ordered to return the property or gains derived from it. Failure to comply may lead to imprisonment up to three years and an additional fine up to five hundred thousand rupees. Together, these sections ensure corporate accountability while balancing protections against misuse of legal processes.
(c)It is established that Section 476 of the Companies Act, 2017, being a non-obstante clause, overrides general laws and provides a complete mechanism for taking cognizance of offences under the Act, including Section 497, which is listed in the Eighth Schedule. Therefore, offences under Section 497 must follow the procedure laid out in the Companies Act. Consequently, the lodging of an FIR by local police for such offences is beyond their authority and is legally invalid. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is allowed, and the impugned FIR registered under Sections 419, 420, 468, 471, 408, and 409 PPC, is hereby quashed, being without lawful authority and jurisdiction.

Summary: Two-word Description: FIR quashment

🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register