Case Details

Citation(s)
2025 SLG 3219 2025 SLD 3219
Peshawar High Court
Writ Petition No. 15..M/2025
QAZI JAWAD EHSANULLAH, J.
20.03.2025 Mr. Aftab Hussain Butt, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. Haq Nawaz K)lan, Addl: A.G. for official respondents.    · Nemo for responclent No.7.

(Umar Sadshah-

VS

,-The State and others)

Law: Pakistan Penal Code, 1860

Section: 302, 365-A

Law: Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1898

Section: 35, 397, 561-A, 382-B

REMARKS

The most crucial question to be determined is whether in the exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, a High Court can order the conversion of consecutive sentences into concurrent ones, despite not being a trial or appellate/revisional court? It is imperative to recognize that this Court possesses inherent jurisdiction as well under Section 561-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 in addition to its constitutional jurisdiction. Section 561-A Cr.P.C. is broad in scope empowering the Court to pass any order necessary to prevent the abuse of the process of court and to secure the ends of justice.

Summary:Sentence Conversion

🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register