| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2025 SLG 3189 2025 SLD 3189 = 2025 PLD 302 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition No. 290-K of 2024, decided on 24th December, 2024. (On appeal from the Judgment dated 22.01.2024 passed by the High Court of Sindh, Circuit Court Hyderabad in IInd Appeal No.39 of 2023).
Present: Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, JJ
Naeem Suleman, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner. Rafiq Ahmed Kalwar, Advocate Supreme Court, Ghulam Rasool Mangi, Advocate-on-Record for
Respondent No. 4 along with
Respondent No.4. Hakim Ali Shaikh, A.A.G. for
Respondents Nos. 1-3. Date of hearing: 24th December, 2024.
Civil Petition No. 290-K of 2024, decided on 24th December, 2024. (On appeal from the Judgment dated 22.01.2024 passed by the High Court of Sindh, Circuit Court Hyderabad in IInd Appeal No.39 of 2023).
Present: Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, JJ
Naeem Suleman, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner. Rafiq Ahmed Kalwar, Advocate Supreme Court, Ghulam Rasool Mangi, Advocate-on-Record for
Respondent No. 4 along with
Respondent No.4. Hakim Ali Shaikh, A.A.G. for
Respondents Nos. 1-3. Date of hearing: 24th December, 2024.
AHMED ALI TALPUR---Petitioner
VERSUS
SUB-REGISTRAR LATIFABAD, HYDERABAD and others---Respondents
Law: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)
Section: O.VII, R. 11
Law: Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)
Section: O.VII, R.11(a)
(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)---
----O.VII, R. 11---Rejection of plaint---Piecemeal rejection---Multiple reliefs--- Principle---Law does not permit piecemeal rejection---If even one prayer in plaint is found to be maintainable, plaint cannot be rejected in parts.
(b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)---
----O. VII, R. 11(a)---Subsisting cause of action---Effect---Plaintiff is required to demonstrate not only that a right has been infringed in a manner entitling him to relief but also that at the time of approaching the Court, the right to seek that relief was subsisting.