Case Details

Citation(s)
2025 SLG 3180 2025 SLD 3180 = 2025 PLD 352
Lahore High Court
Intra Court Appeal No. 71740 of 2023, decided on 25th April, 2024.
Before Anwaarul Haq Pannun and Sultan Tanvir Ahmad, JJ
Muhammad Azhar Siddique, Ms. Salma Riaz and Ms. Amna Liaqat for Appellants. Muhammad Mansoor Ali Sial, Assistant Attorney General for Pakistan and Muhammad Nawaz Shah, Additional Advocate General, Punjab for
Respondents. Date of hearing; 25th April, 2024.

FARAZ IQBAL JAMIL and another---Appellants

VERSUS

The FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and 4 others---Respondents

Law: Exit from Pakistan (Control) Ordinance, 1981

Section: 3

Law: Passports Rules, 2021

Section: Rule 22

Exit from Pakistan (Control) Ordinance (XLVI of 1981)---

----S. 3---Passports Rules, 2021, R. 22 (2) Lists A & B---Passport Control List (PCL)---Categories of persons---Appellants were aggrieved of placing their names in PCL and were denied exit from Pakistan for the reason that their mother had been declared proclaimed offender in a criminal case---Validity---Federal Government is vested with powers to regulate departure from and entry within Pakistan, under R. 22 of Passport Rules, 2021---It is required under R. 22(2) of Passport Rules, 2021, that Directorate concerned and Directorate General of Immigration and Passport maintain PCL for placement of names in categories "A" and "B"---Category "A" admits names of persons involved in anti-state activities--There was no allegation against appellants for anti-State activities, levelled by authorities---Under category "B" list of names of those who had been refused passport but did not fall in category "A" was to be maintained---Respondents authorities never refused passport to appellants under Passport Rules, 2021--Criminal case in question involved allegation of huge loss to government exchequer and accused in that FIR did not join investigation---This alone could not be a valid reason for placing names of appellants on PCL for such a long time and curtailing their rights recognized in law---Year of occurrence given in FIR was 2019 when appellants were less than 16 years of age---Division Bench of High Court set aside the order passed by Judge in Chambers of High Court as names of appellants could not be retained in PCL---Intra Court Appeal was allowed in circumstances.

The Federal Government through Secretary Interior, Government of Pakistan v. Ms. Ayyan Ali and others 2017 SCMR 1179; Sheikh Shan Ilahi v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Interior, Ministry of Interior, Islamabad and 6 others PLD 2023 Lah. 359; Mian Muhammad Shahbaz Sharif v. Federation of Pakistan and 4 others 2019 PCr.LJ 1123; Dr. Joseph Wilson v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Interior and others 2017 PCr.LJ 1569; Messrs United Bank Ltd. v. Federation of Pakistan and others 2014 CLD 544; Farah Mazhar and 3 others v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of Interior, Islamabad and 2 others PLD 2022 Lah. 119; Mrs. Ifrah Murtaza and another v. Government of Pakistan and others PLD 2019 Lah. 565; Hamid Khan through Authorized Attorney v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of Interior, Islamabad and others 2024 YLR 59; Faisal Maqbool Shaikh v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Interior, Ministry of Interior, Islamabad and 2 others (W.P. No. 2141 of

🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register