Case Details

Citation(s)
1977 SLG 1361 1977 SLD 1361 (1977) 110 ITR 834
Allahabad High Court
CIVIL MISC. WRIT No. 1541 OF 1974 NOVEMBER 24, 1976
D.M. CHANDRASHEKHAR AND R.M. SAHAI, JJ.

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

Phool Chand Bajrang Lal

v.

Income Tax Officer

Law:

Section:

JUDGMENT Chandrashekhar, J.-In this petition under article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner has prayed for issue of a writ quashing the notices issued to it (the petitioner) under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), for the assessment years 1963-64 to 1968-69, and for issue of a writ of prohibition restraining respondent No. 1, the Income-tax Officer, "B" Ward, Azamgarh (hereinafter referred to as "the ITO"), from proceeding with the reassessment proceedings in pursuance of such notices. At the outset, certain material facts which are not in dispute may be stated. The petitioner is a firm which was assessed to income-tax. In the assessment year 1963-64, the petitioner claimed that it had borrowed a sum of Rs. 50,000 on May 19, 1962, from M/s. Jain Finance Distributors (India) (Private) Ltd., having its registered office at Calcutta (hereinafter referred to as the "Calcutta company"). This alleged borrowing was shown in the entry dated May 25, 1962, in its (the petitioner's) books of account and in the balance-sheet as liability. In the interest account produced before the ITO interest on this amount of Rs. 50,000 was shown for each of the relevant previous years. At the instance of the ITO, it (the petitioner) filed a copy of the account of the Calcutta company with it. It also produced before the ITO a letter dated November 15, 1963, written by the Calcutta company confirming this alleged loan of Rs. 50,000 to the petitioner on May 19, 1962. In the assessment of the petitioner for each of the years 1963-64 to 1968-69 the ITO allowed deduction of interest claimed to have been paid by the petitioner to the Calcutta company on this sum. On August 26, 1971, the ITO issued a notice to the petitioner in which it was stated, inter alia, that the deposit of Rs. 50,000 appearing in the name of the Calcutta company was not genuine, that it (the petitioner) failed to disclose fully and truly all the material facts necessary for its assessment for the year 1963-64, that thus its income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment and that he proposed to reopen the case for the assessment year 1965-66 under section 147(a) of…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492