| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2025 SLG 3069 2025 SLD 3069 = 2025 YLR 972 |
Lahore High Court, Multan Bench, Multan
Writ Petition No. 268 of 2020, heard on 30th October, 2024.
Before Sadiq Mahmud Khurram, J
Muhammad Ali Buttar for Petitioner. Sanam Fareed Baloch, Assistant Advocate General Punjab along with Khalid A.S.I for the State.
Writ Petition No. 268 of 2020, heard on 30th October, 2024.
Before Sadiq Mahmud Khurram, J
Muhammad Ali Buttar for Petitioner. Sanam Fareed Baloch, Assistant Advocate General Punjab along with Khalid A.S.I for the State.
ISHFAQ AHMAD---Petitioner
VERSUS
ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE and 4 others---Respondents
Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
Section: 403
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 13(a)
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--------S. 403---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 13---Quashing of order---Double jeopardy---Scope---Applicant was aggrieved of an order passed by Trial Court whereby DPO was directed to register a case against the petitioner/ complainant in respect of offence under S.302 P.P.C---Held, that perusal of the record revealed that the petitioner got registered case FIR. in respect of offences under Ss. 302, 324, 186, 427 & 34 P.P.C, stating therein that deceased had died due to firing made by accused "AA" and after investigation of the case, report under S.173 Cr.P.C. was submitted against said "AA"---Said "AA" was tried by the trial Court, however, he was acquitted of the charges but while passing the judgment, the trial Court issued a direction to the D.P.O. to register a case against the petitioner in respect of offence under S.302 P.P.C with regard to qatli-amd of deceased---It was an admitted fact that "AA" also filed a private complaint against the petitioner as well as eleven other co-accused in respect of offences under Ss.302, 364, 149, 148 and 109,. P.P.C with the allegations that the petitioner and his co-accused had committed the qatl-i-amd of deceased after abducting him---Petitioner and co-accused were summoned to face the trial of the said case and after completion of trial, the trial Court acquitted the petitioner and other co-accused of all the charges against them---Case which was lodged by the petitioner himself in respect of the offences under Ss.302, 324, 186, 427 & 34 P.P.C with regard to qatl-i-amd of deceased was also decided on the same day by the trial Court, however, while passing the said judgment it was directed that a case be registered against the petitioner in respect of an offence under S.302, P.P.C. for committing qatl-i-amd of the deceased---It was apparent from the perusal of record, case FIR and the private complaint, that both related to the allegation regarding the abduction and qatl-i-amd of deceased and the petitioner was acquitted after trial of the charge of abduction and qatl-i-amd of deceased, however, by way of the judgment in the case instituted upon the police report, a…