Law:

Section:

 Through this writ petition, the petitioner has assailed order dated 25.04.2017 passed by the Federal Ombudsman, for protection against harassment of women at the work place, whereby application filed by the petitioner for initiation of proceedings under section 476 Cr.PC was dismissed.

2.        Brief facts of this case are that the petitioner is employee of NADRA, who has filed a complaint for harassment against Muzaffar Ali, etc whereas, during the course of proceedings before the Federal Ombudsman, on 02.03.2017, it was directed to the concerned authorities to submit inquiry report consisting of 651 pages on record. In compliance of order passed by the Federal Ombudsman, respondent No.l, Muzaffar Ali, Deputy Chairman, NADU has submitted report. However, petitioner has alleged that forged and fabricated documents have been filed before the Inquiry Board in order to implicate the petitioner in false crime.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that petitioner is Deputy Assistant Director, NADRA Headquarter, Islamabad, whereas, she has approached the Federal Ombudsman, with specific allegation that respondents are harassing her. Learned counsel for the petitioner further contends that petitioner has approached the Federal Ombudsman, in September 2016, whereas respondents had already initiated inquiry proceedings against her since 06.09.2016, on the ground that she had managed certain medical bills and reimbursed the same. It has further been contended that during the course of proceedings, respondents have submitted forged and fabricated documents on record at pages 35 to 62. He further contends that respondents are annoyed to petitioner due to filing of harassment complaint and as counter blast of said action, departmental inquiry has been initiated. Learned counsel for petitioner further contends that during the course of proceedings before the Federal Ombudsman, it has been observed that documents tendered by the respondents are forged and fabricated. Therefore, she nhoved application under section 476 Cr.P.C, which was turned down vide impugned order dated