Case Details

Citation(s)
2025 SLG 1406 2025 SLD 1406 = 2025 LHC 3379
Lahore High Court
Writ Petition No. 2296 of 2020.
Shujaat Ali Khan, J
Dates of hearing: - 04.12.2024 & 22.05.2025. Petitioners by: - Syed Mujib-ul-Hassan, Advocate alongwith Muhammad Azhar Toor, Deputy Manager (HR), GEPCO.
Respondent No.1 by: - M/s Mirza Aamer Baig and Abdul Aleem Khan, Advocates in Writ Petition Nos. 22374/2020,  22376/2020,  22379/2020, 22383/2020 and 22387/2020. Mr. Azfar Hakeem Awan, Advocate in Writ Petitions Nos.2282/2020, 2283/2020, 2292/2020,   2294/2020,   2308/2020, 2311/2020,   2312/2020,   2315/2020, 2317/2020,   2318/2020,   2323/2020, 2327/2020,   2328/2020,   2333/2020, 2334/2020, 2335/2020 & 2336/2020. Rana Saqib Mumtaz, Advocate in W.P. No.22386/2020. Mr. Salman Riaz Ch., Advocate in Writ Petitions No. 2293/2020, 2314/2020 and 2338/2020. Mr. Khalid Ismail, Advocate in Writ Petitions Nos. 2284/2020, 2309/2020 & 2324/2020. Mr. Usama Zubair, Advocate for respondent No.1 in WP No.2332/2020. Qazi Waqar Majeed, Advocate in Writ Petition Nos. 2291/2020, 2296/2020, 2325/2020,   2326/2020,   2329/2020, 2331/2020, 2339/2020 & 2340/2020.

Gujranwala Electric Power Company etc. v. Ahsan etc.

Law: Companies Act, 2017

Section: 4

Law: State-Owned Enterprises (Governance and Operations) Act, 2023

Section: 2(b),1(C)

Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973

Section: 3,17,23

Law: Regulation of Generation, Transmission and Distribution of Electric Power Act, 1997

Section: 240,260

ORDER
 Through this single judgment I intend to decide the petitions mentioned in the following Schedules having commonality of law and facts: -

Schedule-A

 

Sr. #

 

WP No.

Date of consolidated

decision of Labour Court

 

Date of decision of PLAT

1.2282/202020.02.201925.04.2019
2.2283/202020.02.201925.04.2019
3.2284/202020.02.201925.04.2019
4.2291/202020.02.201925.04.2019
5.2292/202020.02.201925.04.2019
6.2293/202020.02.201925.04.2019
7.2294/202020.02.201925.04.2019
8.

2296/2020

(this petition)

20.02.201925.04.2019
9.2308/202020.02.201925.04.2019
10.2309/202020.02.201925.04.2019
11.2311/202020.02.201925.04.2019
12.2312/202020.02.201925.04.2019
13.2314/202020.02.201925.04.2019
14.2315/202020.02.201925.04.2019
15.2317/202020.02.201925.04.2019
16.2318/202020.02.201925.04.2019
17.2323/202020.02.201925.04.2019
18.2324/202020.02.201925.04.2019
19.2325/202020.02.201925.04.2019
20.2326/202020.02.201925.04.2019
21.2327/202020.02.201925.04.2019
22.2328/202020.02.201925.04.2019
23.2329/202020.02.201925.11.2019
24.2331/202020.02.201925.04.2019
25.2332/202020.02.201925.04.2019
26.2333/202020.02.201925.04.2019
27.2334/202020.02.201925.04.2019
28.2335/202020.02.201925.04.2019
29.2336/202020.02.201925.04.2019
30.2338/202020.02.201925.04.2019
31.2339/202020.02.201925.04.2019
32.2340/202020.02.201925.04.2019
Schedule-B
Sr. #WP No.Date of decision of Labour CourtDate of decision of PLAT
1.22374/202029.01.201925.04.2019
2.22376/202004.09.201925.11.2019
3.22379/202029.01.201925.04.2019
4.22383/202029.01.201925.04.2019
5.22386/202029.01.201925.04.2019
6.22387/202016.01.201925.04.2019

2.  Succinctly, pursuant to a publication, got published by the Director General (HR & Admn.), Gujranwala Power Electric Company Limited (petitioner-GEPCO), the private respondents applied against the post of Assistant Lineman. Upon completion of recruitment process, they were appointed on contract basis, for a period of one year. Since the services of private respondents, subject matter of Writ Petitions falling in Schedule-A, were not being regularized rather they were relieved of their duties upon completion of their contract period, they, after serving requisite Grievance Notices, approached Labour Court No.VII, Gujranwala (Labour Court) by filing Grievance Petitions with the prayers for their reinstatement and regularization in service on the ground that after satisfactory completion of nine months’ service, they attained the status of permanent workmen.

3.    Insofar as the factual narration of the petitions, mentioned in Schedule-B, is concerned, it has been observed that  the  private  respondents  were  found  involved  in concealment of their over qualification, thus, their services were dispensed with by the competent authority. Being aggrieved of termination of their services, they approached the Labour Court seeking reinstatement and regularization.

🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register