| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2025 SLG 1363 2025 SLD 1363 = 2025 SCP 173 = 2025 PTCL 660 = (2025) 132 TAX 291 = 2026 SCMR 610 = 2026 PTD 753 |
Civil Petition No. 2135-L of 2020 (Against the judgment/order dated 25.09.2020 of the Lahore High Court, Lahore passed in W.P.No.42411/2017)
Mr. Justice Yahya Afridi, CJ Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui Mr. Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb
M SAEED TAHIR ASC,
Commissioner Inland Revenue, Lahore and others. … Petitioners
VERSUS
Salman Butt and others. … Respondents
Law: Income Tax Ordinance, 2001
Section: 174(3), 174, 122(5)
Summary
The Supreme Court addressed whether a taxpayer is required to retain and produce tax records beyond the statutory period prescribed in Section 174(3) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, particularly when legal proceedings are pending. The case arose after the Lahore High Court (LHC) had ruled that the taxpayer could not be compelled to produce records due to the expiry of the statutory retention period, even though audit proceedings could continue. The Supreme Court overturned this, holding that if any tax proceedings are pending (i.e., the case is sub judice), the taxpayer must retain records until the final decision, regardless of the standard six-year limit, provided the initial notice was issued within the prescribed timeframe.
Core Points
Statutory Retention Period: Section 174(3) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, generally requires taxpayers to retain records for six years after the end of the relevant tax year123.
Proviso to Section 174(3): If any proceedings are pending before any authority or court, the taxpayer must maintain records until the final decision of those proceedings. "Pending proceedings" is broadly defined to include assessment, amendment, appeal, revision, reference, petition, prosecution, or ADRC proceedings245.