| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2025 SLG 1269 2025 SLD 1269 = 2025 LHC 2719 |
C.R. No.2164 of 2011
Mr. Justice Rasaal Hasan Syed
22.4.2025 Mr. Majid Karim Khokhar, Advocate for petitioners. Nemo for the respondents.
Muhammad Iqbal and others
VERSUS
Muhammad Ashraf and others
Law: Limitation Act, 1908
Section: 113
Law: Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1898
Section: VII Rule 11
Case Summary:Limitation Dispute
Brief Summary:
The petitioners challenged a judgment dated 06.06.2011 by the learned Additional District Judge who had accepted the respondents/plaintiffs’ appeal and remanded the case for trial. The original civil suit was for declaration and specific performance of a sale agreement dated 04.07.1984. The trial court had earlier rejected the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC citing it as time-barred and without cause of action. However, the appellate court held that:
The plaint disclosed a valid cause of action.
The issue of limitation was a mixed question of law and fact, to be decided after recording evidence.