| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2024 SLG 6452 2024 SLD 6452 = 2024 YLR 1043 |
Sindh High Court, Sukkur Bench
C.P. No. S-84 of 2022, decided on 20th November, 2023.
Before Arbab Ali Hakro, J
Safdar Ali Bhatti for Petitioners. Nemo for
Respondents. Mehboob Ali Wassan, Assistant Advocate General for Province of Sindh.
C.P. No. S-84 of 2022, decided on 20th November, 2023.
Before Arbab Ali Hakro, J
Safdar Ali Bhatti for Petitioners. Nemo for
Respondents. Mehboob Ali Wassan, Assistant Advocate General for Province of Sindh.
MUMTAZ HUSSAIN and 5 others---Petitioners
VERSUS
ALLAH WADHAYO through L.Rs. and others---Respondents
Law: Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979
Section: XVII,5,15
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section:
Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979)-------Ss. 5 & 15---Tenancy agreement---Oral tenancy---Petitioner/landlord sought eviction of respondent/tenant on the plea of bona fide personal need and default in payment of monthly rent---Rent Controller and Lower Appellate Court declined to evict respondent/tenant on the ground that there was no written tenancy agreement--Validity---Method in respect of execution of tenancy agreement has been provided in S. 5 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979---Purpose of enactment of S. 5 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979, is to provide manner for making agreement and care has to be taken to avoid any doubt or ambiguity in execution of the same---This did not mean that oral tenancy was prohibited under Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979---No such provision was provided in Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979, to exclude jurisdiction of Rent Controller in respect of a dispute between landlord and tenant based on oral tenancy---In the present case there was relationship of landlord and tenant between the parties and Rent Controller as well as Lower Appellate Court committed irregularities while misreading and non-reading of evidence available on record and had decided issue of relationship of landlord and tenant in negative manner by dismissing rent application solely on such ground without giving findings on default and personal bona fide use---High Court set aside concurrent orders passed by two Courts below and the matter was remanded to Rent Controller for decision afresh---Constitutional petition was allowed accordingly.Allies Book Corporation through L.Rs v. Sultan Ahmad and others 2006 SCMR 152; Ahmad Ali alias Ali Ahmad v. Nasar-ud-Din and another PLD 2009 SC 453;Shajar Islam v. Muhammad Siddique and 2 others PLD 2007 SC 45; PLD 2006 SC 549; Kumar Krishna Prosad Lal Singha Deo v. Barabori Coal Concern Limited and others 1937 AIR (PC) 251 and Muhammad Anwar through his legal heirs representative v. Abdul Shakoor 1982 SCMR 1120 ref.Date of hearing: 16th October, 2023.ORDERARBAB ALI HAKRO, J.---Through this petition, the Petitioners have impugned the Order dated 16.12.2019, passed by the learned 1st…