| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2025 SLG 1164 2025 SLD 1164 = 2025 LHC 2552 |
Lahore High Court
WRIT PETITION NO.3048 of 2018
MIRZA VIQAS RAUF, J.
Date of hearing: 16.04.2025 Petitioner: Mr. Ajam Naz Malik, Advocate.
Respondents No.1 to 3 by: M/s Abdul Rauf Qureshi and Usama Bin Salam, Advocates.
Respondents No.4 to 8 by: Nemo.
WRIT PETITION NO.3048 of 2018
MIRZA VIQAS RAUF, J.
Date of hearing: 16.04.2025 Petitioner: Mr. Ajam Naz Malik, Advocate.
Respondents No.1 to 3 by: M/s Abdul Rauf Qureshi and Usama Bin Salam, Advocates.
Respondents No.4 to 8 by: Nemo.
ADEEL KHALEEL
VERSUS
SHAHID HASSAN and 10 others
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 199
Law: Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1898
Section: 115,148,XXXIX Rule 2(3)
SUMMARY: Two-word Description: Time-barred Revision
Following points are discussed in this judgement: i) It is an oft repeated principle of law that when a decree is conditional and it stipulates the condition as well as the consequence of non-fulfillment of such condition the court would become functus officio on the target date. ii) Whether there is no period of limitation prescribed for prosecution of the revision application in the Limitation Act, 1908
The petitioner filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 26th July 2004.