| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2024 SLG 6239 2024 SLD 6239 = 2024 PLC 324 |
Islamabad High Court
Writ Petition No.3226 of 2019, decided on 18th August, 2023.
Before Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb, J
Shahid Anwar Bajwa and Abdur Rehman Bajwa for Petitioner. Raheel Zafar, Senior Manager (Legal), Nauman Ahmad, Executive Legal, Ubaid Abbasi, Manager (Legal), P.T.C.L. Munawar Iqbal Duggal, Additional Attorney General for
Respondents. Arshad Mehmood Kiani, Deputy Attorney-General. Mirza Muhammad Afzal for
Respondent No.1.
Writ Petition No.3226 of 2019, decided on 18th August, 2023.
Before Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb, J
Shahid Anwar Bajwa and Abdur Rehman Bajwa for Petitioner. Raheel Zafar, Senior Manager (Legal), Nauman Ahmad, Executive Legal, Ubaid Abbasi, Manager (Legal), P.T.C.L. Munawar Iqbal Duggal, Additional Attorney General for
Respondents. Arshad Mehmood Kiani, Deputy Attorney-General. Mirza Muhammad Afzal for
Respondent No.1.
PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY LTD.
VERSUS
Mst. FATIMA and others
Law: Industrial Relations Act, 2012
Section: X,33(6),33(7),33(5),57(1)(a), 57(2)(a) & 67(8)
Law: National Industrial Relations Commission (Procedure and Functions) Regulations, 2016
Section: 45,57
(a) Industrial Relations Act (X of 2012)-------Ss. 33(6)& 33(7)---Orders passed by the National Industrial Relations Commission ('NIRC'), non-compliance of---Complaint against the employer for its non-compliance of previous order(s) passed by NIRC---Order of the NIRC not specifying a date /period for compliance of order---Lady, who was appointed as Naib Qasid by Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited ('PTCL') retired on superannuation; her pensionary benefits were allowed by the National Industrial Relations Commission ('NIRC') vide two orders which (orders) were maintained upto the Supreme Court, thus, having attained finality ('the final orders'); on noncompliance, she filed complaint /petition before the National Industrial Relations Commission ('NIRC') praying not only for a direction to pay all pensionary benefits but also for the PTCL (respondents in the said complaint) to be punished for not showing compliance with the final orders---National Industrial Relation Commission allowed worker's complaint / petition against the employer /PTCL--Employer (PTCL) filed constitutional petition assailing order passed by the Full Bench- NIRC whereby its appeal against the said (complaint allowing) order was dismissed---Question was whether the NIRC could punish petitioner/PTCL or any of its (PTCL's) officers for defaults in giving effect to its(NIRC'S) previous (two/final) orders---Contention of the petitioner /PTCL was that S.33(7) of the IRA, 2012, did not permit the prosecution of a person under S.33(6) if the order or decision of the NIRC did not specify a date within which such order or decision was to be implemented---Validity---Section 33(6) of the Industrial Relations Act, 2012, (IRA, 2012) empowers the NIRC to punish a person with imprisonment (for a term which may extend for a period of one year) or with a fine (which may extend to Rs.75,000/-) or both where such person defaults in giving effect to or complying with an order or a decision of the NIRC within seven days or within the period specified in such order or decision---Section 33(7) of the IRA, 2012, provides that no person shall be prosecuted under S.33(6) except on a…