Case Details

Citation(s)
2024 SLG 6171 2024 SLD 6171 = 2024 PCRLJ 1863
Supreme Court (AJ&K)
Criminal Revision No. 03 of 2024 and Criminal Miscellaneous No. 07 of 2024, decided on 17th May, 2024. (From the judgment/order of the Shariat Appellate Bench of the High Court dated 29.12.2023, passed in Revision Petition No. 459 of 2023).
Present Raja Saeed Akram Khan, C.J. and Raza Ali Khan, J
Tahir Aziz Khan, Advocate for Petitioners. Sh. Masood Iqbal, Advocate-General for the State. Ch. Abdul Jabbar, Advocate for
Respondent No.2.

MUDASSAR IQBAL and 6 others---Petitioners

VERSUS

The STATE OF AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR through Advocate General of the State of J&K and another---Respondents

Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Section: 161,172,265C

Law: Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984)

Section: 49

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)-------Ss. 161, 172 & 265-C---Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Art. 49---Privileged documents---Scope---Provision of copies of statement of witness---During the proceedings of trial, Investigating Officer submitted additional statements of purported prosecution witness bearing their signatures and thumb impressions, besides the alleged statement under S.161, Cr.P.C.---Petitioners requested the Trial Court to provide the copies of those statements for further cross-examination which the Court denied---Petitioners filed a revision petition which was also dismissed--Validity---Section 265-C, Cr.P.C., outlined the procedure for providing statements and documents to the accused in criminal cases initiated/based on a police report--Such provision mandated that the accused must be given copies of specific documents at no cost and that must be done no later than seven days before the trial begins---Legal requirement is that the accused be provided with copies of such statements---Such legal provision aims to ensure that the accused is not disadvantaged in their defence, as they rely on the evidence and material gathered by the investigating agency to determine their defence strategy---By providing access to these statements, the law seeks to uphold the principle of fairness and ensures that the accused can make informed decisions regarding their defence based on the available evidence---However, S.172, Cr.P.C. provides an exception toS.161, C.P.C., establishing the independence of the two provisions---While S.161, Cr.P.C. mandates that the Investigating Officer must separately record statements from individuals familiar with the case's facts, S.172, Cr.P.C., pertains to the maintenance of case diaries, documenting the investigation's progress---Case diaries are deemed privileged and inaccessible to the accused, as they served as a record of the investigation's various stages---However, statements recorded under S.161, Cr.P.C., even if included in case diaries, do not enjoy the same privilege--Such statements are considered public documents under Art.49 of the Qanun-eShahadat, 1984, and are inherently relevant under the same…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register