Case Details

Citation(s)
2025 SLG 575 2025 SLD 575 = 2025 MLD 114
Lahore High Court, Multan Bench, Multan
W.P. No. 3022 of 2023, decided on 3rd October, 2024
Before Asim Hafeez, J
Sheikh Jamshaid Hayat for the Petitioner. Ijaz Ahmad Gurmani for
Respondents.

MUHAMMAD AKHTAR SHAH---Petitioner

VERSUS

JUDGE FAMILY COURT, KOT ADDU and 2 others---Respondents

Law: Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961

Section: VIII,5

Law: Family Courts Act, 1964

Section: XXXV,5

Law: Pakistan Penal Code, 1860

Section: 365B

(a)    Muslim Family Laws Ordinance (VIII of 1961)-------S. 5---Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964), S.5 & Sched.---Suit for jactitation of marriage instituted by lady---Execution of valid Nikah Nama---Failure to prove--Effect---Family Court decreed the suit against the petitioner declaring alleged Nikah as void and the same (finding) was affirmed by the Appellate Court--Assertion of the petitioner was that respondent/lady renegaded from her previous position/ stand, who (lady) had filed various petitions and made statements, including statement under S.164 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898, acknowledging her status as lawfully wedded wife of the petitioner---Validity---Record (evidence) revealed that conduct, relationship and execution of Nikiah Nama was categorically denied by respondent /lady in the plaint and as a witness---Petitioner, who alleged existence of valid marriage and sought decree of conjugal rights, utterly failed to prove conduct of marriage; and was evasive regarding sharai nikah in the written statement, and later pleaded conduct of sharai nikah, which was obviously an afterthought---Petitioner produced (got exhibited) Nikah Nama but failed to prove its execution, validity and lawfulness---Even otherwise requirements of a valid Nikah in terms of Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961, were not proved--Petitioner testified that Nikah was arranged and conducted in the office of a lawyer, where 10- 12 persons were sitting, but none of whom was produced as witness--Evidence of witness of the petitioner /defendant did not inspire any confidence, who submitted affidavit( having been marked) stating against marriage between petitioner and respondent /lady, but when confronted with it, he stated that he was under pressure ; said witness was shown as representative of the bride, who admitted having acquaintance with the lady because she worked at the medical clinic of the petitioner---Said evidence substantiated allegation by respondent / lady against petitioner that latter abducted her, and the evidence of said witness had no weightage or value---No witnesses of Nikah Nama were produced---Advocate in whose chamber Nikah was allegedly…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492