Case Details

Citation(s)
2025 SLG 541 2025 SLD 541 = 2025 PLD 45
Peshawar High Court
Civil Revision No.34-D of 2023 with Civil Misc. Nos.5I and 58-D of 2023, decided on 14th November, 2023.
Before Muhammad Faheem Wali, J
Ahmad Ali, Haji Shakeel and Miss Shumaila Awan for Petitioner. Rizwanullah Khan Arain for Rrespondent No.1. Aamir Farid Saddozai, Assistant Advocate General for
Respondents Nos. 4 to 8.

ATTAULLAH---Petitioner

VERSUS

GHAZANFARULLAH and others---Respondents

Law: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)

Section: XVII,3,XV,4

Law: Specific Relief Act, 1877

Section: I,12,42,54

Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)-------O. XVII, R. 3 & O. XV, R. 4---Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Ss.12, 42 & 54--Suit for specific performance, declaration and permanent/mandatory injunction--Alternate prayer for recovery of earnest money---Non-deposit of remaining sale consideration---Dismissal of suit by the Court under O. XVII, R. 3, C.P.C.---Power of Court to proceed further when either party fails to comply with order of the Court or when provisions of O. XVII, R. 3, C.P.C., is invoked---Scope---Contention of the petitioner was that suit should have been dismissed entirely without passing of money decree---Validity---Where a party to a suit, to whom time has been granted, fails to perform any act necessary to the further progress, for which time has been allowed, the court may, notwithstanding such default, proceed to decide the suit forthwith---Word 'forthwith' does not mean to pronounce judgment at once or dismiss the suit at the same time---Though the word 'forthwith' means without any further adjournment yet, it cannot be equated with the words "at once pronounce judgment' as used in O. V, R. 4, C.P.C.---Language employed in O. XVII, R. 3. C.P.C., by using the words 'the Court may, notwithstanding such default, proceed to decide the suit forthwith' is permissive and discretionary and does not, in all circumstances, entail penal consequences---Although suit of the respondent could be dismissed due to non-deposit of remaining sale consideration, yet he could not be dislodged from the relief in equity for the return of already paid money---Provisions of R. 3 of O. XVII do not place any bar on the discretion ofCourt to proceed ahead with the suit in view of the circumstances of the case--Civil Revision was dismissed accordingly.Muhammad Aslam v. Nazeer Ahmad 2008 SCMR 942; Hasham Khan and others v. Haroon ur Rashid and others 2022 SCMR 1793 and Muhammad Asif Awan v. Dawood Khan and others 2021 SCMR 1270 rel.Date of hearing: 2nd November 2023.JUDGMENTMUHAMMAD FAHEEM WALI, J.---Petitioner, through this civil revision filed under Section 115 of C.P.C., has called in question the vires of Judgment and Decree dated 18.01.2023 of the learned…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492