| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2025 SLG 356 2025 SLD 356 = 2025 LHC 183 = 2025 PLD 630 |
Lahore High Court
Writ Petition-Miscellaneous-Auction 3661-24
Mr. Justice Jawad Hassan
Date of hearing 04.02.2025 Petitioner(s) by Mr. Fahad Iqbal, Advocate. Mr. Shoaib ur Rehman, Advocate in connected W.P.No.3851 of 2024. Mr. Samar Khan, Advocate in connected W.P.No.3852 of 2024.
Respondent(s) by Mr. Khalid Ishaq, Advocate General Punjab alongwith Imran Shaukat Rao and Abid Aziz Rajori, Assistant Advocate Generals and Dr. Muhammad Ashraf, Director General Livestock Department, Punjab, Dr. Sohail Azmat, Deputy Secretary Technical and Muhammad Iqbal, Deputy Secretary (Admin), South Punjab Secretariat. Barrister Bushra Saqib, Advocate on behalf of
Respondent M/s Noor Traders. Abdus Salam, Senior Law Officer on behalf of
Respondent/Punjab Procurement Regulatory Authority. Mujtaba-ul-Hassan and Adil Sarwar Sial, Research Officers, Lahore High Court, Rawalpindi Bench.
Writ Petition-Miscellaneous-Auction 3661-24
Mr. Justice Jawad Hassan
Date of hearing 04.02.2025 Petitioner(s) by Mr. Fahad Iqbal, Advocate. Mr. Shoaib ur Rehman, Advocate in connected W.P.No.3851 of 2024. Mr. Samar Khan, Advocate in connected W.P.No.3852 of 2024.
Respondent(s) by Mr. Khalid Ishaq, Advocate General Punjab alongwith Imran Shaukat Rao and Abid Aziz Rajori, Assistant Advocate Generals and Dr. Muhammad Ashraf, Director General Livestock Department, Punjab, Dr. Sohail Azmat, Deputy Secretary Technical and Muhammad Iqbal, Deputy Secretary (Admin), South Punjab Secretariat. Barrister Bushra Saqib, Advocate on behalf of
Respondent M/s Noor Traders. Abdus Salam, Senior Law Officer on behalf of
Respondent/Punjab Procurement Regulatory Authority. Mujtaba-ul-Hassan and Adil Sarwar Sial, Research Officers, Lahore High Court, Rawalpindi Bench.
KAKAKHAIL TRADERS
VS
PROVINCE OF PUNJAB ETC
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 199(1)(1A),198
Law: High Courts (Establishment) Order (Punjab Amendment) Ordinance, 1981
Section: (3)
(a) Jurisdiction---
----Jurisdiction of Court---Assumption/exercise of---Scope---Every Court prior to taking cognizance and adjudicating upon an issue should first resort to the question of assumption of jurisdiction of the Court and if it comes to the conclusion that jurisdiction can be assumed only then it can adjudicate upon the issue.
Government of Sindh through Secretary Education and Literacy Department and others v. Nizakat Ali and others 2011 SCMR 592 and Fauji Foundation and another v. Shamimur Rehman PLD 1983 SC 457 ref.