| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2025 SLG 326 2025 SLD 326 = 2025 PCRLJ 109 |
Lahore High Court, Rawalpindi Bench, Rawalpindi
Criminal Appeal No. 865 of 2022, heard on 5th August, 2024.
] Before Sadaqat Ali Khan, J
G.M. Shah and Sardar Gul Nawaz Khaliq for Appellant. Naveed Ahmad Warraich, DDPP with Arif, Inspector for the State. Muhammad Afzal Khan Jadoon, Asif Mahmood Haider and Arfia Saadat with Complainant (Abida Parveen) for the Complainant.
Criminal Appeal No. 865 of 2022, heard on 5th August, 2024.
] Before Sadaqat Ali Khan, J
G.M. Shah and Sardar Gul Nawaz Khaliq for Appellant. Naveed Ahmad Warraich, DDPP with Arif, Inspector for the State. Muhammad Afzal Khan Jadoon, Asif Mahmood Haider and Arfia Saadat with Complainant (Abida Parveen) for the Complainant.
KASHIF JAMAL---Appellant
Law: Penal Code (XLV of 1860)
Section: 302(b)
(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)-------S. 302(b)---Qatl-i-amd---Appreciation of evidence---Delay of seven hours in conducting post-mortem---Consequential---Accused was charged for committing murder of the son of complainant by firing---Post-mortem report showed that the dead body was received in the dead house on 11.03.2022 at 12:30 a.m. whereafter police papers were received by the Medical Officer at 05:00 a.m., then post-mortem was conducted with an unexplained delay of more than seven hours from the time of occurrence---Such delay was generally suggestive of a real possibility that time had been consumed by the police in procuring/planting eye-witnesses, involving the appellant-convict and in cooking up a story for the prosecution before preparing police papers necessary for getting a post-mortem examination of the dead body conducted---Appeal against conviction was accordingly allowed.Irshad Ahmad v. The State 2011 SCMR 1190 rel.(b) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)-------S. 302(b)---Qatl-i-amd---Appreciation of evidence---Night time occurrence--Source of light not established---Accused was charged for committing murder of the son of complainant by firing---Complainant and her husband furnished ocular account of the incident---Complainant stated in her cross-examination that source of light was not mentioned in her statement, upon which FIR was lodged before the police---Complainant further stated in her cross-examination that her examinationin-chief was recorded on 23.06.2022 but she had not mentioned the source of light therein---Complainant had also not stated in her examination-in-chief that she told the police about the source of light in her statement before police and police had not recorded such fact---Husband of complainant had also not disclosed the source of light at relevant time even in his examination-in-chief---Investigating Officer admitted in his cross-examination that no source of light was available at the spot and during the inspection he had not collected any source of light at the spot---In such circumstances, identity of the appellant in dark hours of the night at a distance of 88/90 feet, (as mentioned in site plan) when he was heading in…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492