| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2025 SLG 227 2025 SLD 227 = (2025) 131 TAX 35 |
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue, Multan Bench
ITA NO.3289/LB/2015, decided on 23.09.2021, date of hearing: 17.09.2021
MIAN ABDUL BASIT, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND RIZWAN AHMAD URFI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER.
Muhammad Amjad, D.R for the Appellant. Muhammad Maqbool Khan, Advocate for the
Respondent.
ITA NO.3289/LB/2015, decided on 23.09.2021, date of hearing: 17.09.2021
MIAN ABDUL BASIT, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND RIZWAN AHMAD URFI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER.
Muhammad Amjad, D.R for the Appellant. Muhammad Maqbool Khan, Advocate for the
Respondent.
THE CIR, RTO, MULTAN
VS
DR. HAFEEZ ANWAR WAPDA TOWN, MULTAN
Law: Income Tax Ordinance, 2001
Section: 114,120,122(1),122(5A),127,129,177
Law: General Clauses Act, 1897
Section: 24A
BackgroundThis is an appeal filed by the tax Department challenging an order passed by the Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals) [CIR(A)] on August 12, 2015.The case involves an individual taxpayer who runs a clinic/hospital.The taxpayer's case was selected for audit, and discrepancies were found by the Additional Commissioner Inland Revenue (AdCIR).The AdCIR passed an order under section 122(5A) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, disallowing certain expenses and adding them to the taxpayer's income.The taxpayer appealed to the CIR(A), who deleted or reduced some of the additions made by the AdCIR.Key IssuesThe main question is whether expenses in different categories can be disallowed under section 122(5A) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001.The scope and application of section 122(5A) were discussed, emphasizing two conditions: the assessment order must be erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue.Tribunal's FindingsThe Tribunal found that the AdCIR's order did not meet the requirements of section 122(5A).The inquiries conducted by the AdCIR were deemed to be outside the scope of section 122(5A) and more akin to an audit under section 177.The Tribunal emphasized that section 122(5A) is not meant for revenue generation purposes but is a curative section for specific circumstances.The amended assessment order was found to lack proper reasoning and evidence for disallowing expenses.OutcomeThe Tribunal dismissed the tax Department's appeal, upholding the CIR(A)'s decision.The Tribunal declared the appeal meritless and devoid of legal force.This case highlights the importance of adhering to proper legal procedures and the specific scope of different sections in tax law when conducting assessments and appeals.ORDER:MIAN ABDUL BASIT, JUDICIAL MEMBER:---.---This is an appeal under section 131 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 (the Ordinance, 2001) filed by the tax Department to throw challenge on the impugned order dated 12.08.2015 passed by the learned Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals), Multan [CIR(A)] on the grounds enumerated in appeal memo.2. Brief facts culled out from the record of appeal file are that the appellant/taxpayer is an individual…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492