Case Details

Citation(s)
2025 SLG 225 2025 SLD 225 = (2025) 131 TAX 63
Peshawar High Court
Writ Petition No. 737-P of 2021, decided on 11.04.2023, date of hearing: 11.04.2023
ABDUL SHAKOOR, JUSTICE AND SYED ARSHAD ALI, JUSTICE
Aamir Bilal for the Petitioner. Sanaullah DAG, Gul Nazir Azam and Ishtiaq Ahmad (Junior) for the
Respondents.

M/S TEST INTERNATIONAL

VS

FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION/CHAIRMAN FBR, ISLAMABAD AND OTHERS

Law: Customs Act, 1969

Section: 25,79,80,81(1),81(2),81(4)

Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973

Section: 199(1)(a),199(1) (c)

BackgroundThe case involves a petition filed under Article 199 of the Constitution of Pakistan.The petitioner imported a Range Rover vehicle and filed a Goods Declaration for its clearance.The Customs authorities provisionally assessed the duties and taxes, requiring a bank guarantee for the differential amount.Main IssuesThe Customs authorities failed to make a final determination of duties within the stipulated six-month period.The Assistant Collector ordered the encashment of the bank guarantee after the six-month period expired.Key Legal PointsSection 81 of the Customs Act, 1969 governs the provisional determination of liability.Subsection (4) of Section 81 states that if final determination is not made within the specified period, the provisional determination shall be deemed final.The differential amount secured through a bank guarantee is not part of the provisional determination.Court's InterpretationThe court found that the Assistant Collector's approach was not in line with Section 81 of the Customs Act.When final determination is not made within the stipulated period, only the provisionally determined amount should be considered final.The differential amount secured through a bank guarantee should be returned to the importer if not finalized within the given timeframe.ConclusionThe court appears to be leaning towards favoring the petitioner's stance, suggesting that the bank guarantee should be returned due to the authorities' failure to make a final determination within the required period. JUDGMENT:SYED ARSHAD ALI, JUSTICE:---.---Through the instant petition filed under Article 199 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 (“Constitution”), the petitioner has approached this Court praying that:-‘In view of the above, it is most respectfully prayed that writ under Article 199(1)(a) and (c) may be issued to the following effects:i. It may very graciously be declared that the stipulated period given under Section 81(2) of the Act has expired at the end of six months of the date of provisional determination. And since there is no final determination within the six months, the provisional determination became final under Section…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492