Case Details

Citation(s)
2025 SLG 218 2025 SLD 218 = 2025 SCMR 14
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition No. 3520 of 2020, order date: 9th October, 2024. (Against the judgment dated 22.09.2020 passed by the Lahore High Court, Rawalpindi Bench, in W.P. No.2572 of 2018). Date of hearing: 9th October, 2024.
AMIN-UD-DIN KHAN, MUHAMMAD ALI MAZHAR AND IRFAN SAADAT KHAN, JJ
Barrister Muhammad Mumtaz Ali, Addl. A.G., Punjab for Petitioners. Muhammad Shoaib Shaheen, Advocate Supreme Court for
Respondents Nos. 1, 3, 4 and 6-8.

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, LAHORE AND OTHERS---PETITIONERS

VS

QASIM MEHMOOD AND OTHERS---RESPONDENTS

Law: Punjab Regularization of Service Act, 2018

Section: 3

Punjab Regularization of Service Act (XV of 2018)-------S. 3---Regularization of service---Matter referred to Scrutiny Committee---Authorities were aggrieved of order passed by High Court referring matter of respondents/contract employees to Scrutiny Committee---Validity---To accommodate and regularize services of contractual employees who gave their blood, toil, tears and sweat for many years, Punjab Regularization of Service Act, 2018 was promulgated with fair intention---It was responsibility of Government to apply and allow benefit to all employees placed in equal and similar circumstances without any discrimination and not to pick and choose employees for conferring benefit or advantage of law---Implementation of Punjab Regularization of Service Act, 2018 has to be unbiased and non-discriminatory, rather it should be evenhanded, fair and square---When law giver enacts any beneficial law, it must be implemented across the board with assiduousness and meticulousness without any conservative or rigid approach---Implementation of beneficial statutes meant for civil servants and labourers are unnecessarily being delayed which forces deprived persons to knock the doors of Courts---If implementation is made in its letter and spirit within a reasonable period of time, then such course would decrease unnecessary burden on Court's docket---Supreme Court declined to interfere in the matter as High Court only held that respondents/contract employees were liable to be considered for regularization under Punjab Regularization of Service Act, 2018 and appointing authority was directed to send their cases for consideration to competent authority and till determination of eligibility, services of respondent/contract employees would not be terminated---Petition for leave to appeal was dismissed and leave was refused. JUDGMENT:MUHAMMAD ALI MAZHAR, JUSTICE:---.---This Civil Petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment dated 22.09.2020, passed by the learned Lahore High Court, Rawalpindi Bench, in W.P.No.2572 of 2018.2. The short-lived facts of the case are that the respondents were performing their duties as Teachers in the School Education Department,…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492