Case Details

Citation(s)
2025 SLG 215 2025 SLD 215 = 2025 SCMR 40
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition No.531-P of 2024, order date: 4th October, 2024. (Against the judgment dated 26.02.2024 passed by Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Service Tribunal, Peshawar in Service Appeal No.1267 of 2023).Date of hearing: 4th October, 2024.
AMIN-UD-DIN KHAN, MUHAMMAD ALI MAZHAR AND IRFAN SAADAT KHAN, JJ
Zahid Yousuf Qureshi, Advocate-on-Record along with Sajid Khan, Focal Person, Education Department for Petitioners. Nemo for the
Respondents.

GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA THROUGH SECRETARY ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, PESHAWAR AND OTHERS ---PETITIONERS

VS

AURANGZEB (EX-PRIMARY SCHOOL HEAD TEACHER) GPS WANNA KHEL TEHSIL TAKHTBHAI DISTRICT MARDAN (DECEASED) THROUGH L.RS ---RESPONDENTS

Law: Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Service Tribunal Act, (I of 1974)

Section: 4

Law: Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Government Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 2011

Section: 5, 7

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Service Tribunals Act (I of 1974)------S. 4--- Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Government Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 2011, Rr. 5 & 7---Constitution of Pakistan, Art.212(3)---Misconduct---Proof---Death of civil servant---Departmental proceedings---Object, purpose and scope---During pendency of service appeal civil servant passed away, therefore, disciplinary actions initiated by authorities were set aside by Service Tribunal---Validity---Predominant goal of initiating departmental proceedings including inquiry is to decide whether allegations of misconduct in show cause notice are proven and then to confront delinquent regarding why disciplinary action, including imposition of minor or major penalty should not be taken---Before taking such drastic action, a fair opportunity should be provided to employee to defend allegations---In departmental inquiries, standard of proof is based on balance of probabilities or preponderance of evidence---Regular inquiry is commenced only when an even handed and fair opportunity to present a defense is offered---Service Tribunal in determination of facts and law, is the highest appellate forum with exclusive jurisdiction over matters relating to terms and conditions of service of civil servants---Supreme Court may grant leave to appeal under Article 212 (3) of the Constitution, against judgment, decree, order or sentence of Administrative Court or Tribunal only if it is satisfied that the case involves a substantial question of law of public importance, which is otherwise sine qua non---Supreme Court declined to interfere in judgment passed by Service Tribunal as no such question was involved---Petition for leave to appeal was dismissed and leave was refused.Secretary Revenue Division v. Iftikhar Ahmed Tabbasum PLD 2019 SC 563 rel. JUDGMENT:MUHAMMAD ALI MAZHAR, JUSTICE:---.---This Civil Petition for leave to appeal is directed against the Judgment dated 26.02.2024, passed by the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Service Tribunal, Peshawar ("Tribunal"), in Service Appeal No. 1267/2023.2. In fact, the deceased respondent was performing his duty in the Elementary and Secondary Education Department, Khyber…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492