Case Details

Citation(s)
2025 SLG 208 2025 SLD 208 2025 SCMR 92
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition No. 3109-L of 2016, order date: 23rd September, 2024. (Appeal against the judgment dated 03.06.2016 passed by the Punjab Service Tribunal, Lahore in Appeal No.2236 of 2015). Date of hearing: 23rd September, 2024.
AMIN-UD-DIN KHAN, MUHAMMAD ALI MAZHAR AND IRFAN SAADAT KHAN, JJ
Ch. M. Lehrasib Khan Gondal, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner. Baleegh-uz Zaman Ch., Addl. A.G. Punjab along with Akhtar Ali Mehmood, DSC (Legal) for
Respondents.

FAISAL ALI---PETITIONER

VS

DISTRICT POLICE OFFICER, GUJRAT AND ANOTHER---RESPONDENTS

Law: Punjab Police (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1975

Section: R.4(1)(b)(iv)

Punjab Police (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1975-------R.4(1)(b)(iv)---Police official---Misconduct, allegation of---Dismissal from service---Ex-parte inquiry---Judgment of Tribunal based on allegations/findings which were never part of the show cause notice---Legality---In the show cause notice the allegation of absence from duty was raised, but based on the same show cause notice, the Tribunal reproduced some other allegations regarding the petitioner's conviction in a criminal case, which allegation was alien to the show cause notice, and no other show cause notice was presented by the parties that indicated any allegation of conviction in a criminal case or requested the petitioner to submit a reply---Departmental proceedings may be initiated on the basis of allegations contained in the show cause notice and not on the allegations which were never part of the show cause notice---Therefore, in all fairness, the departmental action on account of any misconduct should be confined to the allegations mentioned in the show cause notice/statement of allegations, and should not travel beyond its precinct because the accused of misconduct who is petitioner in this case was only liable to answer the allegations communicated to him in the show cause and had no supernatural knowledge to respond to the allegations not known to him---Even the holding of the enquiry was claimed to be a regular one, but it was actually conducted ex-parte without involving the petitioner or providing him any opportunity to defend himself---According to the latest position, the petitioner had been acquitted in the criminal case while being extended the benefit of doubt by the Trial Court---Petition was converted into an appeal and allowed; consequently, the impugned judgment was set aside and the matter was remanded to the Service Tribunal to decide the appeal afresh in accordance with law. JUDGMENT:MUHAMMAD ALI MAZHAR, JUSTICE:---.---This Civil Petition for leave to appeal is directed against the Judgment dated 03.06.2016 passed by the Punjab Service Tribunal, Lahore, in Appeal No.2236/2015, whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner was dismissed.2. The transitory facts of the…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492