| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2025 SLG 125 2025 SLD 125 2025 SLD 13 |
C.R. No. 14 of 2023, decided on 31.5.2023. Date of hearing: 12.5.2023.
SARDAR AHMAD HALEEMI, J.
Mr. Abdul Razzaq Sher, Advocate for Petitioners. Mr. Shaukat Kakar, Advocate for
Respondent No. 1. Mian Badar-e-Munir, Advocate for
Respondent No. 4. Mr. Abdul Tahir Kakar, State Counsel for Official
Respondent.
MUHAMMAD ISMAIL AND 3 OTHERS--PETITIONERS
VERSUS
CANTONMENT EXECUTIVE OFFICE, QUETTA CANTT AND OTHERS--RESPONDENTS
Law: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)
Section: O.VII Rule. 11
Law: Specific Relief Act, 1877
Section: 42, 54
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (V of 1908)--
----O.VII R. 11--Specific Relief Act, (I of 1877), Ss. 42 & 54--Rejection of suit--Concurrent findings--Deceased was belongs to shia sect--Deceased was issueless--Both parties filed succession certificates--Succession certificate filed by respondent was allowed--Respondent was also obtained letter of administration--Question of whether petitioners being cousins of deceased have entitlement in state of deceased Faqir Hussain--Doctrine of return--Both parties filed separate succession certificates which were contested by both parties--Succession certificate filed by Respondent No. 1, was allowed while petitioners’ succession certificate was dismissed--Respondent No. 1 also obtained letter of administration from concerned Court--According to settled principles of Shia law, first class excluded second one and second class excluded third one--Under Shia law of inheritance, Respondent No. 4 being nephew of deceased succeeds one-half of sharer, and remaining half will also revert to him under law of Doctrine of Return, while petitioners were maternal cousins of deceased fall in third class of heirs in Shia law of inheritance and were not entitled in inheritance of deceased--Courts below had concurrently recorded their findings of facts and law, which High Court found as perfectly in accordance with available evidence of parties--Civil revision dismissed.
2022 SCMR 1054 ref.
ORDER
This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the judgment and decree dated 30.07.2022 (hereinafter “the impugned judgment and decreeâ€) passed by learned Civil Judge-III, Quetta (hereinafter “the trial Courtâ€) whereby, the application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC was allowed and the plaint of the petitioner was rejected under Order VII Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure 1908 (CPC) and upheld by learned Additional District Judge-IX, Quetta (hereinafter “the appellate Courtâ€) vide order and decree dated 27-09-2022 (hereinafter “the impugned order and decreeâ€).
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492