| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2025 SLG 91 2025 SLD 91 2025 PLJ 26 |
RFA No. 186 with CM No. 299 with CM No. 541 of 2023, heard on 20.5.2024. Date of hearing: 20.5.2024.
AUTHOR(S): SYED ARSHAD ALI, J.
Mr. Yasir Khalid, AAG for Appellants. Barrister Muhammad Yaseen Raza Khan and Barrister Muhammad Ibrahim Khan Afridi, Amicus Curiae for
Respondents.
GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, PESHAWAR AND OTHERS--APPELLANTS
VERSUS
M/S. HMA PUMPS (PVT) LTD, PESHAWAR CANTT. AND ANOTHER--RESPONDENTS
Law: Arbitration Act, 1940
Section: Rules 2, 4 5, 14, 20, 39, 161
Arbitration Act, 1940 (IX of 1940)--
----Ss. 4, 14, 20, 39 & 161--Contract was awarded--Inordinate delay--Disputed order--Settlement failed--Application for arbitration--Matter referred to arbitrat--Award served--Appeal--Allowed--The umpire can only take cognizance in matter if there are circumstances provided under Rule 4, which, inter alia, includes that both arbitrators could not agree on a particular issue--An umpire could not be called upon to act under Rule 5 if circumstances as provided under Rule 4 did not arise--The order of trial Court remitting award to Umpire was patently illegal and entire edifice built upon said order had to crumble to ground being coram non judice and against letter and spirit of section 16 of Act read with First Schedule of Act--Appeal allowed.
ORDER
The instant appeal filed under Section 39 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (“Actâ€) challenges the order of the learned Civil Judge-XXIII, Peshawar, dated 13.01.2023, whereby the award made by the Umpire on 28.10.2021 and 06.10.2022 was made rule of Court.
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492