Case Details

Citation(s)
2024 SLG 5707 2024 SLD 5707 2024 PLD 951
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Criminal Review Petition No. 103 of 2017 in Criminal Appeal No. 643 of 2009, decided on 5th June, 2024. (To review the judgment of this Court dated 28.10.2015 passed in Crl. Appeal No. 643 of 2009).
Present: Jamal Khan Mandokhail, Ayesha A. Malik and Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, JJ
Hasnat Ahmad Khan, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner. Irfan Zia, D.P.G. for the State. Date of hearing: 5th June, 2024.

GHULAM SHABBIR---Petitioner

VERSUS

The STATE and others---Respondents

Law: Penal Code (XLV of 1860)

Section: 302(b), 307

Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973

Section: 188

Law: Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1898

Section: 382-B

(a)    Penal Code (XLV of 1860)-------Ss. 302(b) & 307---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 188---Review petition---Qatli-amd---Convict sentenced to death remaining incarcerated for a period which is more than a full term of life imprisonment---Effect---Conversion of death sentence into imprisonment for life---Longstanding detention in prison up to or more than the period of imprisonment for life is a complete and distinct punishment, as provided by section 302(b), P.P.C.---In the present case by the time, when his appeal was dismissed by the Supreme Court, the petitioner remained incarcerated for about 25 years, without earning remissions---Despite confirmation of his death sentence by the Supreme Court, the petitioner was awaiting execution of his sentence for the last nine years---It was a fact that till date, the petitioner had served out a sentence of more than 34 years without earning remissions, out of which, he remained incarcerated in death cell for about 24 years---If remissions were counted, his detention may come to almost forty years---Petitioner had served out his sentence for more than a life term and that too, in miserable and inhuman conditions while incarcerated in death cell for twenty four years, which had compromised his personal values and dignity---Delay in conclusion of judicial proceedings and execution of sentence awarded to the petitioner was on account of the system, hence, was beyond his control---Due to this hard fact, the petitioner had faced the agony of prolonged criminal proceedings, hence, was a victim of circumstances, therefore, he could not be penalized for the act of the Court or the Executive---Longstanding delay upto or above the period of imprisonment for life is one of the grounds necessary for awarding lesser punishment, keeping in view the principle of expectancy of life---Review petition was partly allowed, and the judgment under review was upheld, with modification in the quantum of sentence--Resultantly, the conviction of the petitioner under section 302(b), P.P.C. was maintained, however, death sentences awarded to him on two counts were converted into imprisonment for life on two counts, with…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492