| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2024 SLG 5689 2024 SLD 5689 2024 MLD 1995 |
Lahore High Court, Rawalpindi Bench, Rawalpindi
Civil Revision No. 991-D of 2014, heard on 4th September, 2024.
Before Muhammad Sajid Mehmood Sethi, J
Muhammad Shuaib Abbasi for the Petitioner. Imran Shaukat Rao, Assistant Advocate General along with Saeed Nawaz, Tehsildar, Ahtesham Ahmad, Girdawar and Muhammad Haroon, Patwari for the
Respondents. Date of hearing: 4th September, 2024.
Civil Revision No. 991-D of 2014, heard on 4th September, 2024.
Before Muhammad Sajid Mehmood Sethi, J
Muhammad Shuaib Abbasi for the Petitioner. Imran Shaukat Rao, Assistant Advocate General along with Saeed Nawaz, Tehsildar, Ahtesham Ahmad, Girdawar and Muhammad Haroon, Patwari for the
Respondents. Date of hearing: 4th September, 2024.
Raja ABDUL GHAFOOR---Petitioner
VERSUS
PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through District Collector, Rawalpindi--Respondent
Law: Displaced Persons (Land Settlement) Act, 1958
Section: 10
(a) Displaced Persons (Land Settlement) Act, (XLVII of 1958)-------S.10---Cancellation of allotment---Fraud---Jurisdiction of Chief Settlement Commissioner to investigate the legitimacy of evacuee claim and to reverse the allotment orders obtained through fraud---Scope---Suo motu powers of courts/tribunals to review its orders obtained through fraud---Scope--Responsibility of the authorities to address and rectify the effects of fraud--Contention of the petitioner was that after repeal of the Evacuee Laws in the year 1975 the allotment had become a past and closed transaction, thus, the same could not be cancelled without associating him---Validity---Under S.10 of the Displaced Persons (Land Settlement) Act, 1958, the Chief Settlement Commissioner has the jurisdiction to adjudicate or investigate the legitimacy of evacueeclaims and if fraud is found in the allotment process, he can reverse the allotment order--Transaction had been proven to be bogus and fraudulent, thus, the protection of being a past and closed transaction did not apply to such fraudulent transactions, as the same were subject to review by the competent authorities and the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court could not be invoked to shield verification orders of claims obtained through fraud---Fraud undermines even the most solemn proceedings and any structure based on such fraudulent transactions stands automatically dismantled and any ill-gotten gains achieved by fraudster cannot be validated under any norms of law and any benefit/order obtained through fraud, misrepresentation of true facts cannot assume the status of past andclosed transaction and that illegal orders always remain vulnerable to the legal proceedings of investigation---Petitioner had failed to show that initial allotment was genuine and not fraudulent, thus, the contention of petitioner that he was not associated while cancelling mutation passed in his favour was misconceived on the sole principle that fraud vitiates even the most solemn proceedings--Preponderance of judicial authority is in favour of conceding such a power to every authority, tribunal or court to suo motu recall or review an…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492