| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2024 SLG 5442 2024 SLD 5442 2024 YLR 2433 |
Sindh High Court, Hyderabad Bench
Criminal Jail Appeal No. D-152 and Confirmation Case No. D-32 of 2021, decided on 21st February, 2024.
Before Shamsuddin Abbasi and Amjad Ali Sahito, JJ
Imdad Ali Dahri for Appellant. Nazar Muhammad Memon, Additional Prosecutor General Sindh for
Respondent. Muhammad Jameel for the Complainant. Date of hearing: 23rd January, 2024.
Criminal Jail Appeal No. D-152 and Confirmation Case No. D-32 of 2021, decided on 21st February, 2024.
Before Shamsuddin Abbasi and Amjad Ali Sahito, JJ
Imdad Ali Dahri for Appellant. Nazar Muhammad Memon, Additional Prosecutor General Sindh for
Respondent. Muhammad Jameel for the Complainant. Date of hearing: 23rd January, 2024.
MUHAMMAD KASHIF---Appellant
VERSUS
The STATE---Respondent
Law: Pakistan Penal Code, 1860
Section: 302(b),34
(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)-------Ss. 302(b) & 34---Qatl-i-amd, common intention---Appreciation of evidence--Ocular account not proved---Accused were charged for committing murder of the daughter of complainant by inflicting churri blows---Admittedly, there was no ocular evidence available on the record to connect the accused with the commission of offence as the incident was unseen and FIR was lodged on the statement/dying declaration of the deceased when she was found in injured condition by her father---Complainant had disclosed in the FIR that on 19.08.2014 he was present in his house along with his brother-in-lawand received a call from someone, who informed him that his daughter was injured---After receiving such information, he along with his brother-in-law reached at the house of in-laws of his daughter and found his daughter seriously injured and blood oozing from her injuries---Deceased informed complainant that at the instigation of her mother-in-law, her brother-in-law caused knife/churri blows to her--Complainant further disclosed in his evidence as well as in the FIR that he along with his brother-in-law went outside the house to take the vehicle and in the meanwhile the husband of the injured/deceased had taken injured to local Hospital and then to Civil Hospital where she succumbed to the injuries--Circumstances established that the prosecution had failed to prove its case against the accused beyond any shadow of doubt---Appeal against conviction was allowed, in circumstances.(b) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)-------Ss. 302(b) & 34---Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 164---Qatl-i-amd, common intention---Appreciation of evidence---Confession, retraction of--Scope---Accused were charged for committing murder of the daughter of complainant by inflicting churri blows---Accused was arrested on 21.08.2014 and his confessional statement was recorded on 27.08.2014 with a delay of about six (6) days---Except the confessional statement made by accused there was no other evidence available on record---Later on the accused retracted his confessional statement while recording his S.342 Cr.P.C. statement---Confession alone cannot form the basis of a…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492