| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2024 SLG 5413 2024 SLD 5413 2024 PLD 35 |
Peshawar High Court
Cr. M. Q. P. No. 54-M of 2017, decided on 20th June, 2022.
Before Muhammad Ijaz Khan, J
Hazrat Rehman for Petitioner. Dost Muhammad Khan and Fayaz Muhammad Qazi for Private
Respondents. Sohail Sultan, Asst:A.G for the State. Date of hearing: 20th June, 2022.
Cr. M. Q. P. No. 54-M of 2017, decided on 20th June, 2022.
Before Muhammad Ijaz Khan, J
Hazrat Rehman for Petitioner. Dost Muhammad Khan and Fayaz Muhammad Qazi for Private
Respondents. Sohail Sultan, Asst:A.G for the State. Date of hearing: 20th June, 2022.
GUL ZADA---Petitioner
VERSUS
HAZRAT GUL and others---Respondents
Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
Section: 145, 561-A
(a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)-------Ss. 145 & 561-A---Inherent jurisdiction of High Court---Quashing of complaint--Dispute concerning land etc.---Assuming of jurisdiction---Pre-conditions---On complaint filed by respondent, Trial Court declined to initiate proceedings under S. 145, Cr.P.C. with regard to land in question---Respondent assailed order of Trial Court before Lower Appellate Court which remanded the matter to Trial Court for decision afresh---Petitioner sought quashing of complaint filed under S. 145, Cr.P.C., with regard to land in question---Validity---Respondent/ complainant wanted that his share in land in question was to be separated and handed over to him---Complaint in question fell short of legal requirements for maintaining or proceeding with the same---Question of title or claiming share or separation of share could not be determined in proceedings under S. 145, Cr.P.C.---Such aspect of the matter was rightly appreciated by Trial Court---Proceedings under S. 145, Cr.P.C. could only be initiated if there was a dispute regarding land, water or boundaries of land but such dispute should be of such a nature which had either raised or was likely to raise apprehension of breach of peace---Such proceedings could not be initiated for establishing question of title or for separation of shares amongst joint owners---Proceedings under S. 145, Cr.P.C. could only be maintainable if rival parties claimed exclusive possession against each other and such dispute turned them inimical to each other---Proceedings under S. 145, Cr.P.C. were not maintainable where contents and language of complaint spoke of a civil dispute amongst joint owners/co-owners---High Court set aside order passed by Lower Appellate Court as the matter was wrongly remanded to Trial Court--Resultantly complaint was quashed---Petition was allowed accordingly.Mst. Rifat Rana v. Rashid Mahmood PLD 2019 Pesh. 230; Saleem-ur-Rehman v. Faqir Hussain and others 2004 SCMR 667; Ghulam Maseih alias Gaman and another v. Ch. Abdur Rehman and 3 others 1973 PCr.LJ 439; Sultan Room and 6 others v. Bakht Karam and another 2010 MLD 1669; Abdus Salam Meaji and others v. Abdul Kadir Bepari…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492