Case Details

Citation(s)
2024 SLG 5327 2024 SLD 5327 2024 YLR 667
Gilgit Baltistan Chief Court
Civil Revision No. 66 along with C.M. No. 765 of 2023, decided on 26th September, 2023.Date of hearing: 26th September, 2023.
Before Ali Baig, C.J.
Israr Hussain and Shujaat Ali for Petitioners. Arsalan Hussain for the Contesting
Respondent No.1.

MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN---Petitioner

VERSUS

SABIR HUSSAIN and 4 others---Respondents

Law: Specific Relief Act, 1877

Section: 42

Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)-------O. XXXIX, Rr. 1 & 2---Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), S. 42---Suit for declaration--- Temporary injunction sought--- Ingredients--- Claim of the plaintiff was that he was owner-in-possession of suit-property which was transferred vide mutation (mutation-in-question) in the name of the defendant only with the condition that the same would be returned to him once he would return the amount borrowed from the defendant---Application for the temporary injunction filed by the plaintiff was dismissed by the Trial Court which order was maintained by the Appellate Court--- Validity--- Petitioner/ plaintiff, in order to substantiate his claim, himself had attached an attested copy of the mutation-in-question---Contents of the mutation-in-question revealed that there was no condition written in the same, rather the respondent/defendant had purchased the suit-property for consideration---Petitioner/plaintiff failed to make out an arguable case in his favour and balance of convenience was not in his favour; moreover, eventually, the petitioner/ plaintiff would win the case, the respondent/defendant would return the suit-property, as such he (petitioner) would not suffer irreparable loss if temporary injunction was not granted in his favour---Respondent /defendant, prima facie, seemed to be bona-fide purchaser of the suit-property---No illegality or material irregularity had been noticed in the impugned judgments and orders passed by both the Courts below while declining temporary injunction to the petitioner/plaintiff---Revision was dismissed, in circumstances.JUDGMENTALI BAIG, C.J.---The instant civil revision petition under section 115, C.P.C. has been directed by the petitioner against the impugned judgment / order dated 23.06.2023 passed by the learned Addl. District Judge, Gilgit in C.F.A. No.25/ 2023, whereby the learned 1st Appellate Court Gilgit has dismissed the civil first appeal of the present petitioner by upholding the judgment/order dated 13.06.2023 passed by the learned Civil Judge 1st Class, Danyore in Civil Suit No. 95/2022.2. Succulently facts of the case collected from the available record are that the present…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492