Case Details

Citation(s)
2024 SLG 5227 2024 SLD 5227 2024 PLC 431
Sindh High Court
Suit No.424 of 2022, decided on 3rd October, 2022. Dates of hearing: 11th August, 28th September and 3rd October, 2022.
Before Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam, J
Muhammad Ali Lakhani and Mujtaba Sohail Raja for Plaintiff. Faisal Mahmood Ghani and Sohail Tharani along with Bilal Farooq Alvi, Senior Legal Counsel for Defendant No.1. Ameer Haider and Ovais Ali Shah for Defendant No.2.

MADNI AHMED ALI ARFAT SIDDIQUI

VS

SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY LIMITED through Company Secretary and another

Law: Specific Relief Act, 1877

Section: 42,54

 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)-------Ss. 42 & 54---Suit for declaration and permanent injunction---Plaintiff had challenged the public notice given by defendant No. 1 (Sui Southern Gas Company Limited) through defendant No. 2 for recruitment of professionals in senior management positions---Plaintiff (employee of defendant No.1) was not found fit for promotion---Validity---Merely because rules were non-statutory and relationship of defendant No.1 and plaintiff was that of master and servant, it did not mean that plaintiff and such other employees were remediless---If the service regulations were violated or the established policies were deviated from to deprive an employee, from his career progression, then the suit was maintainable, because S. 24-A of the General Clauses Act, 1897, was also applicable to Defendant No.1, and while framing the policies for the employees, they had to act fairly, justly and reasonably---Posts advertised required specialized qualifications---In order to run the organization in an efficient and viable manner, it was not necessary that a senior management position was always filled up internally through promotion, especially when the present positions were on contract and not regular posts---Defendant No.1 and any other organization, especially of public sector, could hire the services of well qualified and reputed professionals in order to operate efficiently---Secondly, an employee could be considered for such specialized posts, only if he had the requisite qualifications---Merely because he fulfilled the criteria of length of service or any other general criteria for promotion did not itself create a vested right in favour of plaintiff---Defendant No.1 was not bound to promote an employee to the next higher grade if that post required specialized qualifications---Present qualification of the plaintiff should have direct nexus with the posts advertised---Record showed that plaintiff had done B.E. Electronics, thus, obviously he could not be considered for the post of Senior General Manager-Information Technology, which in the present times, was one of the most important posts in any organization; rather, sine qua non for…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492